A first capital fact: we know the context of the third Secret.
1
In fact, properly
speaking, there is only one Secret revealed in its entirety on July 13, 1917.
Now, we all now know three parts out of four: we know the
beginning - the first two parts of the Secret - and the end that surely
constitutes the confusion: "In the end, Our Lady promises us, my
Immaculate Heart will triumph, the Holy Father will
consecrate 'Russia to me, which will
convert, and a time of peace will be given to the world'", It
is in this context already known, marked by Sister Lucia herself at the end of
the second part, that the third Secret is
inserted.
Such is the first fact
that is an important criterion for us: the content of the unpublished part must
fit in with its immediate context and fit harmoniously with the whole of the
message of Fatima, whose coherence is
otherwise quite remarkable.
II
Second important fact: If the circumstances in
which it was revealed prove to us its profound unity, the dramatic
circumstances of its redaction alone reveal to us its tragic gravity.
III
Third very illuminating fact: it is because of its
content and for this reason alone, that since 1960 the successive Popes have
refused to divulge it, John XXIII in the first place, as we have seen, despite
the anxious wait, truly supernatural, of the Catholic crowds.
He was the first to decide to "bury the
Secret". He deposits it, Cardinal Ottaviani recounted, "in one
of those archives that are like a deep black well, black, at the bottom of
which the papers fall, and nobody sees anything anymore." In fact, it
is well known that Sister Lucia's manuscript was placed by the Pope on the desk
of his worktable and that it remained there until his death.
Paul VI suddenly adopts the same
attitude. Elected on June 21, 1963, some time later he claims the text of
the Secret. Proof of his keen concern in this regard. As he did not
know what John XXIII had made of it, he had Monsignor Capovilla questioned, who
indicates the place where the manuscript had been placed. Pope Paul VI
must have read it at the time, but he does not talk about it. You do know,
however, that on February 11, 1967, as the jubilee of the Fatima apparitions
approached, Cardinal Ottaviani made a long statement on the Pope's behalf on
the Third Secret, to explain that it would not yet be divulged. Analyzing
this text, following the Portuguese experts, am I obliged to confirm that, in
order to justify at all costs the non-disclosure of the Secret, the prefect of
the Holy Office,
Pope John Paul I was very devoted to Our Lady of
Fatima. She had gone on a pilgrimage to the Cova da Iria in July 1977.
And, very curiously, Sister Lucia herself asked to meet him. Cardinal
Luciani therefore went to the Carmel of Coimbra and had a long interview with
the seer. I am in a position to affirm that Sister Lucia told him about
the third Secret. He was very impressed and shared her emotion and the
seriousness of the message with those around him, after her return to
Italy. He then spoke and wrote about Fatima in forceful terms, expressing
his admiration and his total trust in Sister Lucia, whom he visibly regarded as
a saint. Having become Pope, he undoubtedly wanted to prepare public
opinion before doing anything. Unfortunately, he was tragically taken from
us before he could speak.
Pope John Paul II, after the attack on May 13, 1981
and before his pilgrimage of thanksgiving on the following May 13, asked for
the help of a Portuguese translator from the Curia to make sense of
"certain expressions of the Secret of the Portuguese
language". He has also read the third Secret. But he has not
wanted to divulge it. In short, we know that Cardinal Ratzinger has been
aware of it; He has declared it to the Italian journalist Vittorio
Messori. He spoke of it twice more, in October 1984 and in June 1985, evoking
its content in very different terms from time to time, which is very
significant for us. But always to make an effort, -very vainly- to justify
the non-disclosure of it. In a nutshell, after twenty-five years, from
John XXIII to John Paul II, it is always the same implacable
rejection; Rome remains stubbornly deaf to all demands, wherever they come
from the Portuguese Hierarchy or those responsible for the Blue Army, Father
Alonso or Reverend Laurentin. Our Father, the Abbe of Nantes, has
multiplied the supplications, on behalf of all the members of the
"Catholic Counter-Reformation League" in April 1973, in November
1974, on May 13, 1975, on November 25, 1978, on May 13, 1983, in January
1985... All these demands have remained unanswered! Such an obstinate silence
must have its reasons. Now, it is found that all those that have been advanced
in 1960 were nothing more than arguments inconsistent. All just to form a thick
smokescreen to hide an overly annoying truth." Cardinal Ottaviani's
reasons in 1967 were no more serious. And the same thing happens today
with those advanced by his successor, Cardinal Ratzinger.
The real reason for Rome's silence, the real reason
that all the others vainly try to hide, is obviously the content of the famous
Secret. This is also a very enlightening new piece of information to
progress in the discovery of Our Lady's last message.
 |
| Energy crisis |
IV
Fourth capital fact: the prophecy of the third
Secret is currently taking place, under our eyes, since 1960. There is in fact
a calendar, a reference is possible in the realization of the prophecies of
Fatima. On the one hand, it is certain that we have not yet reached the
time announced for the conclusion of the secret. Why? Because Russia
has not yet been consecrated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, as it should be,
and as it will be one day. Sister Lucy has clearly made it known, even
after the act of March 25, 1984. Russia has not yet converted and the world is
not at peace, far from it! Therefore, we are not at the end of the
prophecy.
On the other hand, the events announced in the
third Secret do not concern only our future. Well, we have another sign:
1960. Our Lady had asked that the Secret be disclosed in 1960, because, Lucia
told Cardinal Ottaviani, "in 1960, the message will appear clearer." Now,
the only reason that can make a prophecy clearer from a certain date is without
a doubt the beginning of its realization. And we have other statements
from Lucia saying that "the punishment predicted by Our Lady in the third
Secret had already begun." We can be sure that we are currently at
the extreme limits of the time related in the prophecy. We therefore live
the third Secret and attend the events that it announces.
False secrets and false hypotheses.
False secrets that have been published successively for twenty-five
years. The most famous of all was published in 1963 by the German magazine
"Neues Europa" and republished in various magazines. There are
several monstrous errors in that text which sufficiently prove that it is a
falsehood. And, furthermore, even when they tell us that the published
text is made up of "excerpts" from the true Secret, these
"excerpts" are at least four times longer than to be contained in the
sheet of paper on which Lucia has written the whole of the authentic Third
Secret A good number of false hypotheses can also be discarded. Of course,
it is not a question - as Fr. Caprile dares to claim - of a simple invitation
to prayer and penance. The Virgin Mary would not have asked Lucia to wait
until 1944 or 1960 to spread a message that would repeat word for word her
public message of October 13, 1917! Nor are they prophecies of happiness:
the third Secret of Fatima certainly does not meet the optimistic outlook of
Pope John XXIII announcing that the Council would be "a new
Pentecost", "a new springtime for the Church". If this were
so, He himself or his successors would have revealed it to us. "If he
was happy," Cardinal Cerejeira said quite rightly, they would tell us.
Since they don't tell us anything, it's because it's sad! Yes, it's obviously
serious and tragic. The third Secret of Fatima certainly does not meet the
optimistic outlook of Pope John XXIII announcing that the Council would be
"a new Pentecost", "a new springtime for the
Church". If this were so, He himself or his successors would have
revealed it to us. "If it was happy," Cardinal Cerejeira said
quite rightly, "they would tell us. Since they don't tell us anything,
it's because it's sad!" Yes, it's obviously serious and tragic. The
third Secret of Fatima certainly does not meet the optimistic outlook of Pope
John XXIII announcing that the Council would be "a new Pentecost",
"a new springtime for the Church". If this were so, He himself
or his successors would have revealed it to us. "If it was
happy," Cardinal Cerejeira said quite rightly, "they would tell us.
Since they don't tell us anything, it's because it's sad!" Yes, it's
obviously serious and tragic. Nor is it the announcement of the end of the world,
since the prophecy of Fatima ends with a marvelous and unconditional promise,
which should be preached in season and out of season, because it is the source
of an unmistakable hope:
"IN THE END MY IMMACULATE HEART WILL TRIUMPH, THE HOLY FATHER WILL
CONSECRATE ME TO RUSSIA, THAT I KNOW WITH VER THROW, AND THE WORLD WILL BE
GIVEN A TIME OF PEACE".
Would this
be the announcement of a third world war? Of an atomic war? It would
be wise to think about it, because here the prophecy would only confirm the
most lucid political analyses... Wouldn't the Virgin Mary have predicted this
horrible future war that threatens us so tragically? Following Fr. Alonso, it can be shown that this is
certainly not the essence of the third Secret. For a solid reason: and it
is that this announcement of material punishments, of new wars and persecutions
against the Church, constitutes the specific content of the second
Secret. Have we reflected on the terrible significance of those simple
words: "the good will be martyred, will the Holy Father have to suffer
much, will several nations be annihilated?" The Holy Virgin, she told us,
confided Sister Lucia to Fr. , that many nations would disappear from the
surface of the earth, that Russia will be the instrument of Heaven's punishment for the world
if we do not first obtain the conversion of this poor nation". (This
way of acting on the part of God is very common and we find an example of it in
the Holy Scriptures in Isaiah the prophet. Where God, to punish the Jewish
people for their infidelity, says through the mouth of the prophet: "There
is a rod of Assyria!" my wrath! The staff in his hand is an instrument of
my wrath. Against an impious nation I will send him, I will give him order to
go against the people. Object of my wrath to plunder and carry off the booty,
to trample it like the mud of the streets " ) (IS C. 10, Vers. 5 and
6) This is why it is to be feared that the word 'annihilated'' must be taken literally, in its
obvious sense: annihilated, thoroughly destroyed, entirely. Implausible in
1917, this tragic threat is not so for us today, in the atomic age. It is
therefore clear: all the material punishments that still threaten us, including
the most frightening ones, such as nuclear war, or the expansion of communism
over the entire planet, were already announced by Our Lady in her second
Secret, and we also knew the supernatural means to conjure them, before it's
too late. We can be sure that none of this will come in the third part of
the Secret, affirms Fr. Alonso. Or at least, I would add, if there is a
new allusion to it - as is entirely possible - this will not be the essential
theme of this third Secret. Indeed, since the Secret is composed of three
coherent parts,
P.S. _ It is an irrefutable reality
the development of events at present not pleasant, by the way. Russia the
main protagonist of this third secret, she is acting in such a way that makes
us turn our eyes to what is hinted at in the third secret. (in my
humble opinion, the velico conflict between Russia and NATO already began in
Syria in 2017 with the intervention of the latter country that ended with the
victory of Syria and Russia) But she is not the only one, we must
unite the USA , of America because its obstinacy is dragging us ever deeper
into a war of unimaginable proportions.(Currently this trend is more
noticeable in wanting to turn the whole world against Russia if possible, as we
see in Europe that, by following Washington's policies, are suffering a
terrible energy collapse that can no longer be hidden due to Russia's war
against Ukraine, in which NATO is intervening together with the United States.)I
do not intend to do a study on this subject because I have already done so, but
I do say at least two or three things on this subject: Currently, Russia has
renounced the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons signed at the
time of Nikita Sergéyevich Khrushchev, also translated like Nikita Khrushchev
and John Fitzgerald Kennedy, this separation of Russia from the aforementioned
treaty necessarily leads it to enrich the plutonium that is used in nuclear
bombs. The unofficial breaking of relations between these two countries
and finally the unconditional support of the United States of America to the
terrorist faction surrounded by the Syrian army in Aleppo Syria, the war has
already started. We are ready? Here is an excerpt from the Russian
warning against the United States "If
there is a direct aggression by the United States against Damascus and the
Syrian Army, it will lead to dangerous tectonic changes not only in the
territory of this country, but in the region," Russian Foreign Ministry
spokeswoman Maria Zajárova warned on Saturday.
Attached to this writing is a very up-to-date video
of the current situation of the conflict in Ukraine.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario