utfidelesinveniatur

sábado, 8 de abril de 2023

THE RESURRECTION OF OUR LORD JESUS ​​CHRIST.

 


Today the feast of exultation and joy shone on us, the paschal joy came giving us immense joy, since we are invited to the wedding of the Risen Lamb and his wife, who is Mother Church. Therefore, dearest ones, let us rejoice in the depths of our souls, let us exult with joy abroad in displays of jubilation, let us pay homage to God with words of glory, so that in honor of Christ the Redeemer and of his joyful wife and worthy of his praise resound. Let us rejoice, I say, for the increase in our joy, let us rejoice in the fruit of our hope, let us give glory to God for the triumph of victory. And let us proclaim Christ victorious, telling him with hearts overflowing with joy:  You are the hope in our combat and the glory of our race for having defeated the adversaries ". Indeed: Christ, at birth, made us partakers of nature, by suffering, partakers of the benefit of grace and, by resurrecting, partakers of the complement of glory. That is precisely why the prophet David, because he wanted to see the paschal joy and the immeasurable benefit of glory fulfilled in his days, exclaimed with inflated desires with these words: Get up, Lord; save me.  Words in which, in accordance with the most correct order, three things are indicated, namely:  burning desire for the resurrection of the Lord, perfect liberation of the captive man and just extermination of the diabolic power. And not without reason, because on a day like today our Lord Jesus rose by his own virtue, rescued the captive man from the domain of the devil and plunged the devil and his army into the depths of the infernal abyss. According to this, in the first place, the burning desire for the resurrection of the Lord is indicated, and this when it is said:  Get up, Lord; that is, he rises from the dead. Secondly, the perfect liberation of the captive man, and this when it is added:  Save me and, finally, thirdly, the just extermination of the diabolic power, and this when it is added: You hurt those who oppose me without cause. And it is noteworthy that it is said without cause to imply that, although the man was justly detained, nevertheless, the devil held him unjustly captive; whereby it must be concluded that the extermination of his power was just.

1. Turning now to the subject, you have to say that the first thing that is offered to our consideration is the burning desire for the resurrection of the Lord, in accordance with what the prophet says: Get up, Lord. And really, such a resurrection deserved, not only to be desired with medullary cordial love, but also to be celebrated with mouthfuls of accents sweet as honey because of three privileges that the risen Christ had, which are highly convenient for us. As the first privilege, the primacy of novelty not used before (the resurrection itself); as a second privilege, the virtuality of one's own power and, as a third privilege, the example in order to our resurrection or in order to the need that we have of the resurrection.

Coming to the first, it must be said that Christ had primacy over the unused novelty. The reason is because Christ, deposed from the miserable oldness of death, rose from the dead, inaugurating the inestimable joy of new life, since the Lord Jesus Christ, as a man, was the firstborn among mortals, who, after having subjugated the empire of death, was crowned with the diadem of the new incorruption. And, to tell the truth, who would have been the first to overcome the sadness enclosed in inveterate death and to initiate the joy that comes from our perpetual life but he whose key opens the door of eternity? He is, in fact, the one who, as having authority, could order the angels when he said: ¡Raise up, ¡oh princes!, your gates; and you, ¡oh doors!, get up. And it is that the fruit of my blood are the reparation of universal concord and the remission of judicial punishment. In view of which, what I now want is that, the flaming sword being removed from the entrance of paradise, the gate of heaven be opened, as I, the Lord of hosts, having defeated the devil, conquered, at a price of my blood, the kingdom of heaven. From where we have that Christ is, not only as God, but also as man, the King of glory. And, no doubt, it was to this kind of novelty that St. Paul was referring in his first letter to the Corinthians, c15: Christ, says the Apostle, rose from the dead as the firstfruits of the dead. For, as through a man death came, so through another Man came the resurrection of the dead. And as all die in Adam, so all will be revived in Christ. And from there it is that the Apostle, being discreet and prudent, when pointing out the new qualities that compete as the first fruits of the risen Christ, offers our consideration two things: firstly, in effect, so that consolation is not diluted in joy, it puts before our eyes the misery of death, matter of desolation; and this when it is said: by a man death came; and then, so that desolation is not absorbed in sadness, the Apostle proposes to us the medicine of the resurrection, matter of consolation; and this when it is added: So also by a man, that is, by Christ, came the resurrection of the dead. Consequently, his intention was to mitigate one with the other, that is, misery with medicine, or desolation with consolation; and since death Although it has the enemy's fraudulence as its occasion, it recognizes, however, as its origin or cause, the arrogance of the mind and, as its consummation, the concupiscence of the flesh; for this reason the Apostle says: As in Adam, because of the demerit of his transgression, all die. And because the medicine of death comes from divine mercy in attention to the merits of the Lord's passion, for this reason it is added:  So also all will revive in Christ by the merits of his passion.  - From where we have tal the first and immediate cause of death is not God, since God is to be supreme and indeficient, and death the maximum defect among all penal miseries,  but the will of man that deviates from rectitude and justice. perpetual rule of justice, according to that of Wisdom, c.1:  God did not make death nor does he rejoice in the extermination of those who die, He created, on the contrary, all things so that they would last, and healthy are all those that are born in the world; nor is there the beginning of death in them nor is there an infernal kingdom on earth. Because justice is perfect and immortal, and injustice has death as a stipend.

As for the second, Christ, by resurrecting, showed how virtuous his own power is. It was not necessary for him, in fact, although he saw himself constituted as the obliging center of the celestial army, to resort neither to devout prayer nor to angelic ministry; And to this, without a doubt, the psalm refers: for the misery of the helpless and the groaning of the poor, I will rise right now, says the Lord. It is to be known that poor and destitute came to be the holy fathers held as in a very dark prison in limbo, who were, in truth, impotent to free themselves; and for this reason, reduced to a miserable and lamentable state, they eagerly desired to see the benefit of the resurrection accelerated. The Lord heard such vehement desires, in meaning of which we have that the Lord says: I will rise again right now;

But perhaps some physical philosopher may say: ¿How can an animal body, corruptible and composed of contrary elements, ¿become incorruptible and perpetually enduring? To which the theologian responds: If you want your argument to be universally valid, in all matters, you must deal with many inconveniences or absurd nonsense.

That's right, indeed. The first nonsense is that you claim that God is not superior to nature in power, nor is the artist superior to his work; and how absurd it is to say this, there is no one who can doubt it. The reason is because the entire argument of the physicist is summed up in this: It is impossible according to nature; then it is absolutely impossible. And it is manifest that such a consequence cannot be inferred in any way. The second nonsense or inconvenience is that you claim that, on the one hand, nature contains hidden things, which we also admit, since many, in truth, we they are latent, as is to be seen in the calamite that iron is attracted to, in the salamander that is preserved in the fire, and in other similar things and in what do you want, for another, that God has only operations accessible to your eyes; and it is true that saying this constitutes maximum nonsense, since, according to the sentence of Ecclesiasticus, c.43:  We have seen little of his works, and many things greater than these are hidden.  The third drawback is that you claim that God has promised obedience to nature; which, if it were true, we would have to admit that God neither gave sight to the blind, nor health to the lepers nor life to the dead.

And finally, the fourth inconvenience is that you proceed based on presuppositions that are not granted, such as when you affirm that the body is corruptible and is composed of contrary elements, since the soul's preservation in perpetual and immortal life implies, not already corruptible animality, but spirituality, elevation and disposition, above the variety of contrary elements, by virtue of the deiform habit of glory. Such a feeling can be inferred from the words of Saint Augustine in his letter to Consentius, where he expresses himself as follows:  human frailty measures divine things never experienced and is arrogant, boasting of sharpness when he says: if there is flesh, there is blood; if there is blood there are also the other humours; and if there are humors there is corruption" In this way he could say: If there is a flame, it burns; if it burns, it burns; and if it burns, then he burned the two young men in the furnace of fire. However; ¿If you believe that such a case was a miracle, why do you doubt wonderful things? And if you don't believe them, I take it for granted that your blindness is greater than that of the Jews. Therefore, it must be said that the divine power can remove from nature the qualities it wants, leaving it others, and, for the same reason, strengthen, corruptibility removed, the mortal members, conserving them in force, so that the form is true. bodily, but without any blemish; let the movement be true, but without fatigue; the ability to eat is true, but without the need to suffer hunger".

And finally, regarding the third, it must be said that the resurrection of Christ should be desired as an example of our resurrection or of the requirement or necessity that our resurrection demands. Christ, in effect, being as he is the head and exemplary cause of our resurrection, had to rise again to communicate to those of us who are his members the certainty about it, since it is a monstrous thing to raise the head without the members. Hence, against those who denied the resurrection, the Apostle argued, not without great reason and effectiveness, in the first letter to the Corinthians, c.15, with these words: if the dead do not rise, Christ has not risen either.  In effect: since it is necessary for Christ to rise again, since what happened in fact has not happened is not possible at present, the resurrection of the dead necessarily follows. To which cause the Apostle goes on to say:  Because what is corruptible must put on incorruptibility, and what is mortal must put on immortality. In context with which, to insert in the hearts of the faithful, removing doubts, mistrust and bitterness of despair, the Apostle writes in the first letter to the Thessalonians, c.4: If we believe that Jesus died and rose again, so too God will take with Him those who have fallen asleep in Him, and here we conclude that those of us who have firm hope, like blessed Job, should not be saddened without consolation by the death of a good Christian like the others who lack hope.

SOURCE: SAN BUENAVENTURA

 

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario