Note from E. At the time I talked about the Catholic Church in Russia today, in that article I talked about the terrible reality of the Catholic Church in that country. The Catholic Church does not exist in Russia, in its place is the schismatic Orthodox Church. Now I find myself with another terrible reality in China where I have realized, through this writing that fell into my hands, the great communist persecution suffered by the Catholic Church in China, I hope you enjoy it and pray for the few Chinese Catholics.
October 1, 1949: Communism
triumphs in China after thirty years of fierce struggle. From that moment on,
the Catholic Church becomes the target of an oppression that will soon turn
into persecution.
It is not the first time that
Chinese Christians have suffered for their faith. Less than fifty years ago and
only during the year 1900, 191 missionaries and six thousand Christians were
massacred by the Boxers, under the orders of Empress Cixi. (1)
But, under the communist
regime, the persecution takes a form that surpasses all previous ones: slavery.
Slavery of souls, slavery that tries to subdue the Church itself. We can
imagine the concern of the popes before the events that unfold during the
fifties in that nation of the Far East. Hence, the regularity of relations
between Rome and China is not surprising. It is worth following the stages of
such relationships.
Beyond the historical data
and outside the borders of China, what
is the scope of the reactions of both powers? That is what we intend to
discover in this little work. We'll start by taking a look at the history of
communism in China. Afterwards, we will study the responses, decisions and
clarifications of Rome throughout the evolution of the persecution. Finally, we
will analyze the consequences of the different ways of responding to such
decisions.
China,
victim of communism
With the "May 4
Movement" of 1919, Pekingese youth demonstrated against the Japanese
occupation. From that day on, communism gradually penetrated China, taking
advantage of the Sino-Japanese war that would mark the country throughout the
first half of the 20th century.
In 1927, the Chinese
communist movement was nearly defeated thanks to the victory of General Chiang
Kai-Shek. However, during World War II, as Chiang's army desperately fought to
drive out the Japanese invader with British and American support, "the
Chinese experienced the unpleasant sensation of being infiltrated, over
thousands of square miles, by obedient communist agents of Moscow. The Chinese
Communist Party, on the brink of defeat, had found a new ally.
in the confusion of war an
unexpected opportunity for a spectacular revival." How did this happen?
«Roosevelt trusted the experts of him ibid. Washington on Far Eastern affairs,
who advised him on these types of issues. And the advice of the
"experts" was that, to appease the communists, Chiang needed to
integrate some of them into the government and form a coalition. It was
Roosevelt who financed Chiang's army, so his opinion had to be considered;
Chiang Kai-Shek had no choice but to accept."
In Yalta, the administration
of the Manchurian railways, which were a key piece in the strategy against
Russia, was entrusted to a Sino-Soviet company. "An ibid., p.38 Once Japan
was out of the picture, the complete conquest of China by the communists was
merely a matter of months."
The
advent of Mao Tse-tung
On October 1, 1949, the
People's Republic of China was proclaimed. The purges began immediately. In a
June 1957 speech, Mao Tse-tung acknowledged that, between October 1949 and
early 1957, more than eight hundred thousand people had been "liquidated"
for political reasons. Just like that!"
Millions of
"counterrevolutionaries" were arrested: some were executed after
being convicted by "people's courts" in summary trials where anyone
could publicly denounce them. Others were sent to political re-education camps.
The agrarian reform
eliminated the landlords and completely pulverized agriculture. Social
cooperatives were established in which the expropriated land was distributed
among families of poor peasants who were nothing more than the workers of the
land. 140 hectares were occupied by an average of 150 families.
However, these summary
executions (2), expropriations and cruelties did not constitute the most
serious act of the new regime. Certainly they were atrocious things, but they
were only one more means for the establishment of a much more terrible system:
moral slavery.
"As modern slavery,
communism is worse than ancient slavery. First, because the latter was
progress, a relaxation of the columbres aimed at raising awareness of the
rights of the person: instead of massacring prisoners of war, their lives are
spared in exchange for their work. [...] On the other hand, in ancient times,
the slave was the personal property of his master: he could be freed, he could
receive humane treatment if he had a human master. In the communist regime, the
worker is a slave to a collectivity, the leading card of the Party, and even
more is a slave to the ideological system, of which this card is itself the
instrument and victim.
The Communist Party of China
was only 2% of the total population. “This is not a failure of communism. It is
its normal execution, attached to the theory. The Communist Party that holds
power is a hermetic letter of privileged people who are recruited by
co-optation. It is not a hereditary letter,
but sociological. […] The
Communist Party is not the people, nor does it want to be. The Communist Party
is the organism created to dominate and exploit the people. If the people could
be the Party, the Communist Party would lose its meaning and its reason for
being. The Communist Party is a closed system of absolute domination.
Very soon, executions were no
longer enough. Mao practiced brainwashing. What use is it, said he, to kill
evil beings? There will always be more. The only solution, he insisted, is to
heal the thought: better than the body, we can heal it. Experience simply
proves that the brains have not been well washed. We must restart and expand.
And this spiritual purification will be accompanied by intense physical labor
that will humble people and destroy their guilty individualism."
The
outbreak of the persecution
The system of control and
information of the social gears, even of the minor ones, took the form of an
open persecution against the Catholic Church: since the month of August 1950,
the Central Committee of the PCC (Communist Party of China) declared that
Christians were a potential spying force for imperialist operations 3.
Beginning in 1951, priests
were arrested en masse, smear campaigns were unleashed against nuns, foreign
priests were expelled. In certain provinces (for example, in Canton), an
excessive tax was levied on all religious buildings: bishoprics, seminaries,
temples, presbyteries...
In 1952, all Catholic
missionaries were expelled, except for one American bishop, Monsignor James
Edward Walsh, who was falsely accused of being a spy anyway.
Very soon, this persecution
of slavery was added, for the Church, the fact of being reduced to silence:
«The Church can say that it does not accept the atheistic ideology of
communism. The Church of silence can talk about this at length. This does not
cause communism any discomfort: it is in accordance with what communism itself
says and with what communism wants to be said and taught. But this Church is
completely submerged in silence because it cannot publicly repeat and transmit
the fundamental teaching that is summarized in the words of Pius XII: We reject
communism as a SOCIAL system, by virtue of CHRISTIAN doctrine.
»The Church of silence can
say that it believes in God, provided that it does not distract its faithful
from collaborating in the construction of the economic and social regime that
is the fundamental atheistic purpose of communism. [...]» “Communism is an
atheism, but it is an atheism whose particular purpose is not to destroy faith
primarily through ideological means (although it does that too): its particular
purpose is to destroy faith by attacking it on the ground of social organization
and civilization (Divini Redemptoris, (3)».
The
Three-Self Movement
It is difficult to identify
the origin of this powerful movement that took the name of the Three-Self
Movement. Emerged towards the end of 1950 with the support of Su Dingyi, head
of the CCP's Propaganda Department, this movement sought to ensure the
independence and survival of Protestant communities in China. Its three
official goals were to allow Protestants to support themselves (rejecting
funding from abroad), to govern themselves (rejecting direction from abroad),
and to propagate themselves (rejecting the diffusion of the faith from abroad).
: hence the name of the three autonomies. The main leader of the Movement was
an eminent Protestant minister, Wu Yaozhong, who was suspected of having been a
secret member of the CP before the 1949 revolution.
In reality, the Movement was
designed to kill two birds with one stone: firstly, to feed hostility among
Christians towards foreign influences in religious matters and, secondly, to
"indigenize" Christian communities.
Catholics saw in the creation
of the Three-Self Movement a powerful weapon that was erected against them.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………
1. Boxers is the name by
which the Chinese secret society of the Fists of Justice and Harmony is known,
who, in the 19th century, were the vanguard of the fight against Western
influence and Christianity in China . On July 14, 1900, a coalition of French,
English, German, Italian, Austrian, and Russian forces forced Empress Cixi and
her Boxers to flee.
2. It is estimated that Mao
Tse-tung was guilty of massacring almost sixty million victims in China. Jean
Madiran, La vieillesse du monde, NEL, 1966, pp. 46 &
- 3. Boyao Zhang, Crosses,
hammers, and sickles: Sino-Vatican Relations between 1949 and 1989, McGill
University 2015.
4. Cindy Yik-yi Chu, Chinese
Catholicism: An OverView, in Catholicism in China, 1900-present, Paígrave
Macmillan, 2014.
Jean Madiran, op. cit., p. 63
& 65
Pius XII, Christmas Radio
Message igs¡
5. See this issue in Beatrice
KF Leung & William T. Liu, The Chinese Catholic Church in Conflict:
1949-2001, Universal Publishers, 2004, p. 95 & passim.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario