utfidelesinveniatur

sábado, 25 de septiembre de 2021

WHAT HERESIES ARE FOUND IN LUISA PICARRETA'S BOOKS?

 


Note. In a previous publication on this same topic, as interesting as the writings of Luisa Picarreta, a comment on the previous article asked me to give more information from the theological point of view and with more explicit quotes from the Magisterium of the Church in where I exposed the authors of the heresies that Luisa Picarreta exposes in her writings, thank God I was able to prosecute the Picarreta affair in greater depth.

Warning. What is enclosed in parentheses and highlighted in yellow is the work of the editor and not the author of the writing.

“But it must be recognized that in recent times the number of the enemies of the cross of Christ has grown in a strange way, who, with entirely new arts and full of perfidy, are striving to annihilate the vital energies of the Church., and even by totally destroying, if possible, the kingdom of Jesus Christ. Keeping silence is no longer decorous, if we do not want to appear unfaithful to the most sacrosanct of our duties, and if the goodness that we have used up to now, with the hope of amendment, is no longer to be censured as a neglect of our ministry. What, above all, demands of us that we break the silence without delay is that today it is no longer necessary to search for the makers of errors among the declared enemies: they hide themselves, and this is the object of great pain and anguish, in the bosom and union of the Church itself, being enemies all the more damaging when they are less declared. (Encyclical Pascendi Gregis of His Holiness Saint Pius X)

Following the norm of this extract from the Encyclical, it is necessary to raise one's voice about the errors (converted into modern devotion as opposed to the true devotion maintained for centuries in the true Church) that have already taken root in many souls of good will and have adhered to this seer passing the limits, without meaning to, of the Holy Divine Revelation. I know from experience that many will not like what has been done here with hard work to gather the overwhelming evidence against this "seer." These tests are in total accordance with the tradition of the Church, Catholic theology and divine Revelation and, whoever writes this also a priest by the grace of God, fully agrees with Father Rafael OSBFor a long time this was dropped or its due importance was taken away or the very seriousness of these "revelations" was completely ignored. Whoever reads this should not be scandalized or rant against those who wrote this with the sole purpose of saving their souls by pointing out the enemy of the Catholic FAITH. God Our Lord grant them patience and humility to accept what is proven here with forceful arguments and it is necessary to go to the end to form a complete opinion about the danger of these so-called “revelations”.God Our Lord grant them patience and humility to accept what is proven here with forceful arguments and it is necessary to go to the end to form a complete opinion about the danger of these so-called “revelations”.God Our Lord grant them patience and humility to accept what is proven here with forceful arguments and it is necessary to go to the end to form a complete opinion about the danger of these so-called “revelations”.

On the octave of Easter. RV Father A. Vargas.

Revised and augmented with notes from the Magisterium of the Church on the Vigil of the Assumption of Mary Most Holy.

 There are real heresies in the writings of Luisa Picarreta that we will explain in a moment.

Heresies:

1) The first and main heresy is that which goes against Revelation Divine that which was bequeathed to us by Jesus Christ with the death of the last apostle Saint John, with him the deposit fidei as it is commonly called was closed. Now, private revelations, since these are not contained either explicitly or implicitly, will be taken, according to the Latin adage, tantum quantum or as much as they serve the salvation of the soul and as much as they distance us from God will be left without it. necessarily implies the salvation of the soul. Therefore, Luisa Picarreta's revelations fall within this as much as and in no way or under any circumstances condition, much less can they be "superior to Deposito Fidei" to affirm the opposite, as she says in her books, it is to directly attempt against the very deposit of the Faith which is reckless of heresy and contrary to what is taught by the Catholic Church here and everywhere. Hence, what she claims to have received from Almighty God is a "New Revelation" conditioning her only to her writings without making any reference to the deposit of faith. This heresy is sustained, among others, by the Modernist heresy embedded in the Catholic Church founded by Jesus Christ.

2) The second heresy in which Luisa Picarreta incurs is the so-called MONOTELITE  promoted by Sergio Patriarch of Constantinople around the year of the Lord of 634 (From letter 1: Scripta Fraternitatis vestrae Sergio, Patriarch of Constantinople Dz 251) Heresy that denies the two natures in Christ Jesus and admits only one such as the divine to the detriment of the human. This heretical way of expressing himself about the two natures of Jesus Christ was refuted at the time by the Council of Chalcedon (cf Denzinger 146) and, later condemned by the Council of Letran (Dz 258-267)

3) The third heresy contained in the books of this author is the  MONOPHYSITE  who categorically affirm that in Jesus Christ there was only one will contrary to the sentiment of Saint SOFRONIO who defended against Pope Honorius the two wills in Jesus Christ and the sentiment of the Church (DZ 251 AND 1465) The heresy of these consisted in affirming that in Christ there was in effect only one will, the Divine Will, and that the human will of Christ was totally absorbed by the Divinity. His heresiarch was Bishop Sergius, bishop of Constantinople.  (Actually, Patriarch Sergio promoted Monophysitism, not Monotelism, however, it is attributed to him for having supported those who professed this heresy and to Honorius I for giving his consent) This "absorption" then cannot happen. It is impossible for the will of any person to be absorbed by the Divine Will. Free will is suppressed in us, which is an aberration.  (Santo Tomas de Aquino in his treatise of INCARNATE VERB of the theological sum is about the free will of Jesus Christ to the I refer to the readers for a greater knowledge of this question) And that is exactly what Luisa teaches over and over again in her "revelations." Luisa teaches clearly and repeatedly that when one receives this new "Sacrament" of the Divine Will, the human will ceases to function as such, leaving only the Divine Will in us, here it refers to a gross error of nature attributed to Jesus Christ who is the highest perfection and do not in any way dig the imperfection. God sovereign creator and redeemer respects in the common man his free will with which that same man can freely choose between good and evil. Now, if God does this with any man, why would his Son deny his incarnate WORD this free will once he was made MAN? Therefore, in light of Catholic theology (Suma Teológica de Santo Tomas: treatise of INCARNATE VERB) ON THIS TOPIC Luisa Picarreta is totally wrong, necessarily incurring heresy by stubbornly confirming her aforementioned “theory”, that is, Monotelism.

4) The fourth heresy is called Quietism Before continuing with this other heresy we must distinguish between the Molinist quietism of Luis Molina (Dz 1097) and the quietism of Miguel de Molinos, (under the title: "Errors of Miguel de Molinos" the Magisterium of the Church condemns by decree of 28 of August and ratifies this condemnation in the Constitution Caelestis Pastor, of November 20, 1687, you can read all its errors condemned in Dz. 2221 to 2288, because of its breadth it is very long and we cannot cite them all here, but I strongly recommend reading them because it is very interesting to know the mistakes that this Jesuit priest made.

For this Molinist Quietismthere are two ways to reach God: through speech and meditation; and through interior recollection and contemplation. It was an esoteric-elitist dualistic conception. Miguel de Molinos considered that his model of faith was superior, the other inferior; for this reason he criticized the scholastic method and the spiritual fathers, who defended a type of conceptual and external faith.

The Molinist doctrine represents the self-denial of the Self taken to its maximum extreme: personal annihilation as a space of relationship with God. To achieve inner peace, it is necessary to renounce one's own will and submit unconditionally to the divine will, eliminating all vestige of self-love and self-esteem: “This seven-headed hydra of self-love has to be slaughtered to reach the summit of the high mountain of peace”. Whoever loves God cannot love himself:  "There is no happiness in enjoying but in suffering with quietude and resignation."

Luisa Picarreta clung to this error, already condemned by the Church, as we have seen, who teaches, faithfully following Miguel de Molinos, interior annihilation and, by this means, "holiness" is achieved. In addition, it affirms that our free will is not responsible for our actions, thus denying the morality of said actions (eg. If one sins against the sixth commandment in this state that she proposes, he does not commit a sin because his free will simply does not work or is "discontinued")

Faced with these "new" aberrations coming from a heretical mind, as we have seen. The Church reacted by condemning their mistakes.

 “On Wednesday July 13, 1938, in the General Session of the Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office, the most Eminent and Reverend Cardinals, concerned about the defense of the faith and good morals, following the previous recommendation of the Reverend Consultors, They have CONDEMNED and ordered the following works written by Luisa Picarreta and published by others at different times in various places to be inserted into the Index of Prohibited Books:

1. The Contemplation of the Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ, together with a Treatise on the Divine Will.

2. The Kingdom of the Divine Will.

3. The Queen of Heaven in the Kingdom of the Divine Will.

The following Thursday, July 14 of the same month and year, Our Most Holy Father, Pius XI, Pope for Divine Providence, in the usual audience that he granted to the Most Excellent and Reverend Advisers of the Holy Office, approved the decision of the Most Eminent Cardinals, and confirmed and ordered its publication” (Acta Apostolicae Sedis, August 30, 1938).

CATHOLIC PRINCIPLES TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT:

1.- The Christian faith cannot accept “revelations” that seek to overcome or correct the Revelation that effectively closed with the death of the last Apostle, Saint John the Evangelist. (To say then that these private revelations have more importance than the divine ones, disregarding the Supreme Pontiff Pius XI, is to go against the two-thousand-year tradition of the Catholic Church and against the same DIVINE revelation WHICH RAYS IN THE HEREGY)

2- The teaching given in any private revelation must be submitted to the Holy Scriptures and Tradition to prove it. (In this submission to divine revelation the false and true doctrine is tested. "Private revelation is never about the DIVINE, taking a position contrary to the latter is a reckless act of eternal consequences)

3.- Jesus Christ and the apostles gave us everything we need for our salvation and sanctification towards the highest perfection. Teachings that have been faithfully transmitted by the Catholic Church.

Following the order established above, Picarreta attempts against the first point that is the DIVINE REVELATION when he says the following in his works

1. Jesus to Luisa: “I wish to issue a third FIAT as I cannot contain my Love anymore. This will complete the work I started. Otherwise the work of both Creation and Redemption would be incomplete. ¨ (BH, p. 119). A new FIAT is contrary to the one that is written in the Gospel of Saint John and that reaffirms the perfection of the redemptive work when it says CONSUMATUM EST. EVERYTHING IS CONSUMED. To suppose a new FIAT outside of the deposit of faith is an unprecedented audacity since it would suppose the imperfection of the redemption and it would go against the divine perfections exposed by Santo Tomas in his theological summation in his Trinitate treatise. In addition, it is to go against his divine wisdom and his divine providence or government of the universe in all times and circumstances, It goes without saying that these "words" of Jesus Christ to this woman are inadmissible and heretical.

2. Jesus to Luisa: “There will be neither before nor after you, no creature towards whom I will oblige, by necessity, the help of my ministers”. This proposition goes beyond the Molinism of Miguel de Molina because it goes directly against the sacrament of penance and extreme unction, which, as we know, are of divine institution, the quotations of such institutions are in the Gospel of Saint John with these words: "Receive the Holy Spirit, everything you bind on earth will be bound in heaven and everything you untie on earth will be loosed in heaven "and Santiago Apóstol:" He who is sick call the priests to anoint him with the oil of the Salvation". This proposition is also similar to the Protestants in that they reject the sacrament of penance. We are not bound by necessity to follow these private revelations without detriment to the salvation of our souls.

3. Jesus to Luisa: “My mother has supremacy over the whole Church. I have done the same with you… everything that I reveal to you about my Will: the Goods it contains and how the creature must enter it and how paternal goodness wants to open another era of grace. " (BH p. 14)

COMMENT: Luisa claims to have received a new “deposit of faith” that parallels the revelation given to the apostles. Saint Thomas teaches the opposite: “There is a triple state of humanity; the first was under the old Law; the second is that of the new Law; the third will not take place in this life, but in Heaven… we should not expect a state in which man possesses the grace of the Holy Spirit more perfectly than he has possessed him up to now. " (Summa I-II, 106).

Against Saint Thomas is again the “revelation” of Luisa by “Jesus”: “These revelations regarding my Will will be like a balm to heal the wounds produced by the human will. Whoever has the benefit of this knowledge will feel the flow of a new life of light, grace and strength to fulfill my Will in everything ... My daughter, the Kingdom of my Will is invisible. In these writings I have placed superabundant light, grace, and attraction to make my kingdom victorious. IN THE PROPORTION THAT THESE WRITINGS ARE KNOWN, they will wage a sweet battle against the human will and win. " (p.16,BH) (Against principles 1 and 3) The Church venerates the Blessed Virgin Mary as the only perfect creature for the great privilege of being the Mother of God and this exaltation is above all creatures so it says in Saint Luke chap. 1. V. 42: "Blessed are you among women and blessed is the fruit of your womb" and later the virgin herself says: "For this reason all generations will call me blessed." Regarding the latter, we could say, according to her, that redemption does not bring all the benefits that are said in her book, which is contrary to what Saint Peter says in his letter: "By his wounds we have been healed" and in another side:"Without the effusion of blood there is no remission" Whereby we can conclude that the death of Jesus Christ gave us the suffering graces not only for this world but also the special grace that opens the doors of heaven for us.

4. Jesus to Luisa: “Even this way I ask you to pray is not found in any other” (p. 19, BH). 

COMMENT: Here it will be enough for the Magisterium to answer for us: “Let the understanding, knowledge and wisdom of individuals as well as of all, of a man as of the whole Church, grow and progress strongly with the passing of the ages and the centuries; but it only has to be in its own genre, that is, in the same dogma, with the same meaning and the same understanding ". (Dz 1800). Confirming this, Saint Paul says: “I marvel that so soon you turn away from the one who called you by the grace of Christ, and you go to another Gospel. And it is not that there is another Gospel, but rather that there are those who disturb you and pretend to pervert the Gospel of Christ. But, even if we ourselves, or an angel from heaven preached to you a different Gospel than the one we have announced to you, BE ANATEMA.Whereby the deception of the devil is exposed with these two quotes from the Magisterium of the Church and from Saint Paul.

5. Jesus to Luisa: “The soul that does my Will in accordance with the perfection that I taught you… she will surpass all the other Saints… because by remaining in my Will, they will act in a divine, secret and extraordinary way” (BH , p 38).

COMMENT: This proposition is absolutely quietist of Molinist origin as expressed above about it. At this point, I think it is the third, it is interesting to read the theses condemned by the Church on this heretical doctrine, condemned centuries before this genius of Picarreta appeared saying something as new as old at the same time, I will quote some passages from Miguel de Molinos on this error of Picarreta: “To want to act actively is to offend God, who wants to be the only agent; and therefore it is necessary to abandon oneself entirely and entirely in God, and then remain as a lifeless body (Dz. 1222) “By doing nothing, the soul annihilates itself and returns to its own origin, which is the essence of God, in which it remains transformed and divinized, and God remains in himself; because then they are no longer two things united, but only one and in this way God lives and reigns in us and the soul annihilates itself in the operative being. (Dz. 1225) In the last words enters the Monophysite heresy that denies the two wills in Christ Jesus and suppresses free will in us.

6. “I (Luisa), upon hearing this, said to myself: 'Soon He will say that His Will is more than the Sacramental Communion itself.' Then He immediately added: “Right! Correct! Because sacramental communion lasts a few minutes. It is temporary, My Will, on the other hand, is the perennial Communion. " (p.36 BH).

COMMENT: This is completely wrong. Although the Eucharist in terms of its accidents of bread and wine last a few minutes, it is not so in terms of the spiritual order that lasts for a long time as long as the soul does not lose grace and it is considered an increase in it thanks to this permanence. spiritual in our souls. On the other hand, communion is not the end of our pilgrimage on earth but the means to achieve eternal life, therefore, with all property we can say that the Eucharist is not the eternal home of the soul but the spiritual food to reach to this eternal abode. Nuances of Monotelism and quietism are found in this proposition by Picarreta.

7. Jesus to Luisa: “Ah, I repeat to you and I confirm that my Will is a sacrament and surpasses all the sacraments together in a much more admirable way, since it does not need the intervention of anyone or anything material. The Sacrament of my Will is formed between my Will and the will of a soul. When both wills merge with each other, they form the Sacrament. " (P. 106, BH).

COMMENT: This proposition is not in accordance with scholastic theology because, according to the definition of man, the two actions of the soul are distinguished, such as intelligence and will, and since Jesus Christ is the Man-God, these two actions of the soul also exist in Him… Then to pretend that this human will emanating from human nature is a much greater and unique sacrament and sacrament, discarding the sacraments instituted by Jesus Christ himself, is aberrant and heretical and sounds like monothelianism and monophysitism. Finally, due to the hypostatic union in Jesus Christ, the divine nature cannot be separated from the human nature nor can one be suppressed to the detriment of the other, it would be a destruction or annihilation which is impossible in God. (theological sum treatise of Incarnate Word)

8. “When a soul acts in my Will, its humanity is, so to speak, suspended. Then the Divine Life of my Love takes its place and acts ”. (p. 86, BH).

"This is how the soul, until it is buried in my Will and dies completely in It, its will disintegrates in Mine" (p. 28 BH).

COMMENTS: It is the heresy of Quietism. Annihilation of ourselves when we put ourselves in God's hands. Saint Athanasius explains: “The human will will neither resist nor doubt, but will always submit to the omnipotent Divine Will. Because it is necessary for the will of the flesh to act, but being subject to the divine Will. " Before creation we were only ideas in the mind or divine intellect lacking being, but at least we subsisted in it as something that would be later, once created we stop being an idea in God and we become something outside of Him, that is to say , a being either animal or vegetable, but we are something, but Picarreta reduces us to something that God is impossible to do, ANNIHILATION, that is,NOT BEING NOTHING that expresses the word annihilation in the strict sense (Theological sum treaty of creation)

9. “Jesus said to me: 'My dear, look how for the one who lives in my Will there is no grace that comes out of my Will towards all the creatures in Heaven or on earth in which he (that is, he who lives in the Divine Will) is not the first to participate. This is natural because he who lives in his father's house abounds in his possessions. And if those on the outside receive something, it is by virtue of the one who lives inside”. (p.25 BH).

COMMENTS: ¡Obviously for Luisa, living in the Divine Will is joining Our Lady as Mediatrix of all graces! (??).

10.-After her confessor rejected her Absolution, Luisa, however, received Holy Communion. After that refusal she tells us that Jesus told her not to worry… “Because once a person is freed from his own human will and given to my Divine Will, there is no need for a priestly absolution, since this it will be given to you by your loving Jesus”. (BH, Vol. 16. November 5, 1923) 

COMMENTS: Excellent example of the heresies of Monotelism and Quietism. By doing this act of "abandonment to the Divine Will", one will be automatically justified without the need to practice religion at all! Where is the dogma of original sin, where are the current sins that are committed daily while we are in this world and we are not confirmed in grace as the Blessed Virgin Mary, Saint John the Baptist and the apostles after Pentecost?

CONCLUSION:

Luisa Picareta's Divine Will is more than heresy. It is a completely new religion that has a mixture of Protestantism, Modernism, Buddhism, Monotelism, and Quietism. These heresies destroy human responsibility for one's actions. This new religion "reveals" the "magic formula" for becoming essentially equal with God. Satan's slogan wielded against Adam and Eve. I already said that this smells like SULFUR

 Note 1.- BH = Translated from the English version of the book:

When the Divine Will Reign in souls, Book of Heaven: A selection of Passages. Luisa Piccarreta Center for the Divine Will. Jacksonville, FL. nineteen ninety five.

Partager:

Father Rafael OSB

Review and expansion: Father Arturo Var gas Meza

 

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario