Leo Strauss
The events in the Ukraine have surprised many and there is great confusion, fueled by the Atlanticist international press, where the president of Russia is accused of everything.
Despite the fact that this president, on repeated occasions, has
manifested his true intentions and has warned for 8 years of the real danger
that was brewing in Ukraine not only against the Ukrainians themselves but also
against Russia through the self-proclaimed republics of Dombas where there were
14,000. 00 casualties to date, within the civilian population.
On the other hand, no one should underestimate the cunning and
prudence of the president, because let's not forget that he was head of the
extinct k. GB, one of the most advanced Soviet Union espionage
organizations in the world. Vladimir Putin is not a “fool”, nor a “fool”,
nor a “dictator” but, unfortunately, a true born leader that NATO and the world
lack.
The conflict started several days ago, I am not a person who
immediately responds to this conflict, quite the contrary, after a prudent
period of time and a calm analysis, I give my opinion on the subject with
reliable arguments.
Although this article is not mine, it does not reflect the whole
reality, but it provides very important elements to understand the conflict in
Ukraine.
Vladimir Putin at war against the
“Straussians”
Russia is not at war against the Ukrainian people, but against a
small group of individuals who, from within American power, managed to
transform Ukraine without the Ukrainians noticing this transformation. They
are the disciples of Leo Strauss. That group, formed half a century ago,
has already committed an incredible number of crimes in Latin America and the
Middle East, even behind the backs of the Americans. Here we address his
story.
In the early hours of February 24, Russian forces entered
Ukraine. In announcing what he called a " special operation ",
President Vladimir Putin declared, through Russian television, that it was the
beginning of his country's response to " those who aspire to world
domination " and those who extend the NATO infrastructures to the
gates of Russia.
In this long speech, President Putin recalled how NATO destroyed
Yugoslavia, in an attack initiated without authorization from the UN Security
Council, even bombing Belgrade in 1999. He then recalled how the United States
has sowed destruction in the Middle East – in Iraq, in Libya and in Syria. Only
after this extensive exposition of the facts, he announced his decision to send
Russian troops to Ukraine, with the double mission of destroying the Ukrainian
military units linked to the Atlantic alliance and ending the neo-Nazi groups
armed by NATO.
All the member states of that war bloc immediately denounced
what they presented as an occupation of Ukraine comparable to that of
Czechoslovakia at the time of the " Prague Spring "
in 1968. According to these countries, Vladimir Putin's Russia it would have
opted for the " Brezhnev doctrine ", like the former
Soviet Union. Therefore, the " free world " has
to punish the " Evil Empire " by imposing " devastating
costs " on it.
This interpretation of the Atlanticist powers aims above all at
depriving Russia of its main argument by showing that... it is true that NATO
is not a confederation of States equal to each other but a hierarchical
federation submitted to the orders of the Anglo-Saxons. [Washington and
London], but that Russia does the same because it denies Ukraine the
possibility of choosing its destiny, as the Soviets previously denied it to the
Czechoslovaks. In other words, NATO, due to its operation, violates the
principles of sovereignty and equality of States, principles inscribed in the
Charter of the United Nations, but it must not be dissolved as long as Russia
exists.
It seems logical, but it probably
isn't.
President Putin's speech was not directed against Ukraine. Not
even against the United States, but directly against " those who
aspire to world domination ", that is, against the " Straussians "
(disciples of Leo Strauss) installed within American power. It was a true
declaration of war on those individuals.
On February 25, President Vladimir Putin described the Kiev
regime as a " gang of drug addicts and neo-Nazis ". According
to the Atlanticist media, he was talking like a mental patient.
During the night of February 25-26, Ukrainian President
Volodymyr Zelensky sent a proposal for a ceasefire to Russia through the Chinese
embassy in Kiev. Moscow responded quickly by laying out its conditions:
arrest of all Nazis – Dimitro Yarosh [ 1 ],
elements of the Azov battalion, etc. –
removal of all street names and monuments glorifying those who
collaborated with the Nazis during World War II –such as Stepan Bandera
and others–;
order to lay down arms.
The Atlanticist press chose to silence this fact while the rest
of the world, which was only partially aware of it, held its breath. The
negotiation failed hours later… after the intervention of Washington. Only
then was the Western public informed, but always keeping hidden the conditions
set by the Russian side. What is President Putin talking about? What
is he fighting against? Why is the Atlanticist press deaf and dumb?
BRIEF HISTORY OF THE STRAUSSIANS
Let us dwell for a moment on this group, the
"Straussians", about which Westerners do not know much. They are
a group of individuals who, while all Jewish, are not representative of
American Jewry or any other existing Jewish community throughout the world. They
owe the name "Straussians" to the fact that they were trained by the
German philosopher Leo Strauss, who took refuge in the United States at the
time of the rise of Nazism and became a professor of philosophy at the
University of Chicago. According to numerous testimonies, Leo Strauss
surrounded himself there with a small group of students faithful to his ideas
of him, to whom he dispensed oral teachings, due to which there are no writings
about what he instilled in them. In any case, according to later
testimonies, Leo Strauss explained to these disciples that, In order to
protect themselves from a new genocide, the Jews had to establish their own
dictatorship. Leo Strauss called his disciples the "hoplites »,
like the citizen-soldiers of Ancient Greece, and used to send them to sow
disorder in the classes of rival teachers. Apart from that detail, Leo
Strauss also taught them to be “discreet” and even praised what he called the “ noble
lie ”. Leo Strauss passed away in 1973 but the core of his
closest disciples remained united.
In 1972 – that is, half a century ago – these Straussians began
to form a political group. They were all members of Democratic Senator
Henry "Scoop" Jackson's staff, notably Elliott Abrams, Richard Perle,
and Paul Wolfowitz, and worked closely with a group of Jewish Trotskyist
journalists who had met at the City College of New York. York and who edited a
magazine called Commentary . The latter were called
the New York Intellectuals , that is, " the
New York intellectuals ".
These two groups were closely linked to the CIA and,
simultaneously and through Richard Perle's father-in-law – the military
strategist Albert Wohlstetter – to the RAND Corporation, the think
tank of the US military-industrial complex. Many of those
young people married each other and formed a compact group of a hundred people.
In 1974, at the height of the Watergate crisis, this group
drafted and obtained the approval of the " Jackson-Vanik Amendment "
that would force the Soviet Union to authorize the emigration of its Jewish
population to Israel under the threat of economic sanctions. That was the
founding act of the “Straussians”.
In 1976, Paul Wolfowitz [ 2 ]
was one of the architects of Team B or « Team
B », which President Gerald Ford entrusted with the task of assessing
the « Soviet threat » [ 3 ]. Team
B presented a delusional report accusing the Soviet Union of preparing to
achieve " global hegemony ". That report
changed the nature of the cold war, it was no longer a question of isolating
the USSR through the so-called containment but of
"stopping" it in order to save the " free world ".
The "Straussians" and the " New York
Intellectuals ", all from the left, placed themselves at the
service of Republican President Ronald Reagan. But it is important to
understand that these groups are neither truly left nor right. Some of its
members have “migrated” 5 times from the Democratic Party to the Republican
Party and vice versa. The important thing for them is to infiltrate
power, regardless of the ideology of whoever holds it.
For example, in the 1980s Elliott Abrams became an assistant
secretary of state. Thus, he directed an operation in Guatemala, where he
put a dictator in power and experimented – with the concurrence of Israeli
Mossad officers – on the creation of reserves for the original Mayan settlers,
with a view to doing the same later in Israel. with the Palestinian Arabs – an
important testimonial work on this subject earned the Guatemalan indigenous
Rigoberta Menchú the Nobel Peace Prize.
But Elliott Abrams continued his misdeeds in Salvador and later
in Nicaragua –against the Sandinistas–, even becoming seriously implicated in
the Iran-Contra scandal.
For their part, the " New York intellectuals ",
who came to be called " neoconservatives ", created
the " National Endowment for Democracy " (the National
Endowment for Democracy , better known by the acronym NED) and the US
Institute of Peace. , a device that organized numerous " color
revolutions ", beginning in China with the attempted coup d'état
by Prime Minister Zhao Ziyang, which led to the events of Tiananmen Square.
At the end of the presidential mandate of George Bush Sr., Paul
Wolfowitz, who then held the third highest ranking position in the Department
of Defense, produced a document whose central idea was that, following the
disappearance of the USSR, the United States it had to concentrate on
preventing the emergence of new rivals, starting with… the European Union
[ 4 ]. Paul
Wolfowitz concluded by advising unilateral action, that is, to put an end to
consultation within the UN. Wolfowitz is undoubtedly the one who devised
" Desert Storm ", the operation to destroy Iraq that
allowed the United States to change the rules of the game and impose a
unilateral world. It was at this time that the Straussians implanted the
concepts of «regime change " and " democracy
promotion ".
Gary Schmitt, Abram Shulsky, and Paul Wolfowitz infiltrated the
US intelligence community thanks to the Consortium for the
Study of Intelligence's Working Group on Intelligence Reform. the preconceived
idea according to which other governments reason in the same way as the United
States [ 5 ]
Later, they criticized the lack of political leadership of intelligence,
stating that it was lost in unimportant issues instead of concentrating in
which they considered really essential Politicizing intelligence was precisely
what Wolfowitz had already done with " Team B ".» and
began to do it again, successfully, in 2002, with the Office of Special Plans ( Office
of Special Plans ), inventing arguments to unleash new wars against
Iraq and Iran, thus following the principle of Leo Strauss, who he praised the
« noble lie ».
During Bill Clinton's presidency, the Straussians were pushed
out of power. They then took refuge in the think tanks of
Washington. In 1992, William Kristol and Robert Kagan – the husband of
Victoria Nuland, widely mentioned in earlier works in this series – published
an article in Foreign Affairs magazine deploring
President Clinton's timid foreign policy and calling for a renewal of " the
hegemony United States benevolent » ( benevolent global
hegemony ) [ 6 ]. The
following year they founded the " Project for a New American Century
" ( PNAC) in the offices of the AmericanEnterprise Institute . Gary
Schmitt, Abram Shulsky, and Paul Wolfowitz appear as members of the PNC. All
non-Jewish admirers of Leo Strauss, like the Protestant Francis Fukuyama – the
author of The End of History – immediately join them.
In 1994, Richard Perle – turned arms dealer – appears in Bosnia-Herzegovina
as an adviser to the Bosnian president and former Nazi Alija Izetbegovic. It
is precisely Richard Perle who brings Osama bin Laden from Afghanistan with his
Arab Legion, predecessor of al-Qaeda. Perle will even be a member of the
Bosnian delegation that signs the Dayton Agreements in Paris.
In 1996, several members of the PNAC –such as Richard Perle,
Douglas Feith and David Wurmser– wrote a study within the Institute for
Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS), on behalf of the new Prime
Minister of Israel, Benyamin Netanyahu. This report advises the physical
elimination of the historical Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat, the annexation
of the Palestinian territories, a war against Iraq and the transfer of the
Palestinians to the latter country [ 7 ]. The
report is inspired by the theories of Leo Strauss and also by those of his
friend Zeev Jabotinsky, the founder of " revisionist Zionism ",
who had Benyamin Netanyahu's father as his personal secretary.
The PNAC raised funds for the candidacy of George Bush Jr. and
published, before the second arrival of a Bush to the White House, its famous
report " Rebuilding America 's Defenses "
, where it expresses the hope that a catastrophe comparable to that of Pearl
Harbor could push the American people into a war for global hegemony, exactly
the words that Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, another member of the
PNAC, used on September 11, 2001.
The 9/11 attacks allowed Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz to
place Admiral Arthur Cebrowski under the protective wing of Donald Rumsfeld at
the Department of Defense, where Cebrowski played a role comparable to that of
Albert Wohlstetter at the time of the war. cold War. Admiral Cebrowski
imposed the " endless war " strategy , by virtue of
which the United States would no longer try to win wars but would only start
them to prolong them for as long as possible. The new objective would be
to destroy the political structures of the States in the countries designated
as targets of this strategy in order to deprive them of any possibility of defending
themselves against the United States [ 8]. This
is the strategy that has been applied for the last 20 years against
Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria and Yemen.
In 2003, the Straussians sealed their alliance with the
Revisionist Zionists at a major conference held in Jerusalem, a conference that
Israeli political personalities of all persuasions believed they had a duty to
attend [ 9 ]. So
it is not surprising that Victoria Nuland - the wife of Robert Kagan -, then an
ambassador to NATO, was the person who intervened to proclaim the ceasefire
that allowed - in 2006 - the defeated Israeli army could withdraw from Lebanon
without being pursued by Hezbollah forces.
Bernard Lewis is one of those who worked with all three groups –
with the Straussians, the neoconservatives and the revisionist Zionists. Bernard
Lewis, a former British intelligence agent, acquired American and Israeli
nationalities, was an advisor to Benyamin Netanyahu and a member of the United
States National Security Council. Halfway through his career, Bernard
Lewis claimed that Islam was incompatible with terrorism and that Arab
terrorists were Soviet agents, but then he changed the song and began to say,
with the same aplomb as before, that religion Muslim preaches terrorism. Lewis
invented the " clash of civilizations " story» for the
United States National Security Council and with a view to exploiting cultural
differences to pit Muslims against Orthodox Christians, a concept that was popularized
by Samuel Huntington, assistant to Bernard Lewis at the United States National
Security Council . Except that Samuel Huntington did not present the
" clash of civilizations " as a strategy but as a
fatality against which one had to react. Huntington began his career as an
adviser to the secret services of the South African apartheid regime and later
wrote a book, The Soldier and the State [ 10],
where he asserted that the military, whether they are regular soldiers or
mercenaries, are a separate caste, the only one capable of understanding the
needs of national security.
After the destruction of Iraq, the Straussians were the subject
of all kinds of polemics [ 11 ]. Everyone
is surprised then that such a small group, backed by neoconservative
journalists, has managed to acquire so much authority without being the subject
of public debate. The United States Congress appoints a Study Group on
Iraq – the so-called " Baker-Hamilton Commission " –
for the group's policy. The Baker-Hamilton Commission condemns, without
naming it, the Rumsfeld-Cebrowski strategy and deplores the hundreds of
thousands of deaths that this strategy has already caused. Secretary of
Defense Donald Rumsfeld resigns... and the Pentagon continues inexorably with
the application of this strategy, already condemned but never officially
adopted.
Under the Obama administration, the Straussians find refuge in
the team of Vice President Joe Biden. Biden's current national security
adviser, Jacob "Jake" Sullivan, then played a central role in
organizing the operations against Libya, Syria and Myanmar, while another Biden
adviser, now Secretary of State Antony Blinken, was concentrating on
Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran. It was Blinken who oversaw the secret
negotiations with the Iranian Supreme Guide Ali Khamenei, negotiations that led
to the imprisonment of the main members of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's task force in
exchange for the agreement on Iran's nuclear program.
In 2014, it is the Straussians who organize the " regime
change " in Kiev. From his position as his vice president,
Joe Biden is fully involved. Victoria Nuland travels to Kiev to support
the neo-Nazis of the Pravy Sektor (Right Sector) and supervise the Israeli
"Delta" commando, who commit multiple acts of violence [ 12 ]
in Maidan Square.
It was at that moment that the interception of a telephone
conversation between Victoria Nuland and the United States ambassador revealed
Mrs. Nuland's desire to “ fuck the European Union ” –“ Fuck
the EU! », as he exclaimed in his conversation with the ambassador –
which is consistent with what was expressed in the report that Wolfowitz had
written in 1992. But, the leaders of the European Union apparently “did not
fully understand” what he had meant this “lady” and only mumbled a feeble
protest [ 13 ].
Also at that time, Jake Sullivan and Antony Blinken – despite
the opposition of Secretary of State John Kerry – put Hunter Biden, the son of
Vice President Joe Biden, on the board of directors of Burisma Holdings, one of
the main companies exploitation of Ukrainian natural gas. This son of Joe
Biden is literally a drug addict who will serve as a front to cover up a
monumental swindle to the detriment of the Ukrainian people. Under the
supervision of Amos Hochstein, Hunter Biden then appoints several friends, as
drug addicts as he is, to use them as "representatives" of various
companies and loot Ukrainian gas. They were referred to by Russian
President Vladimir Putin when he spoke of a " gang of drug addicts ".
Jake Sullivan and Antony Blinken also rely on mobster Igor
Kolomoiski, the third richest person in Ukraine. Although he is Jewish,
Igor Kolomoiski finances the thugs of the Pravy Sektor (Right Sector), a
neo-Nazi organization working for NATO and participating in the violence in
Maidan Square during the " regime change "
operation. 2014. Kolomoiski uses his influence to take control of the
European Jewish community until his co-religionists rebel and expel him from
their international associations. However, Kolomoiski managed to get the
head of Pravy Sektor, Dimitro Yarosh, to be appointed deputy secretary of the
National Security and Defense Council set up by the new regime and had himself
appointed governor of the oblast . from Dnipropetrovsk. Kolomoiski
and Yarosh will be quickly removed from political functions. Igor
Kolomoiski and Dimitro Yarosh, recently appointed special adviser to the head
of the Ukrainian armed forces, as well as his supporters, are the neo-Nazis
that President Putin alluded to in his speech on Ukraine.
In 2017, Antony Blinken founded WestExec Advisors, an advisory
firm that brings together former senior officials of the Obama administration
and many Straussians. This firm is extremely discreet about its activities
but uses the political connections of its employees to earn money, precisely
what in any country in the world would be considered " influence
peddling " and " corruption ".
THE STRAUSSIANS MAINTAIN THEIR LINE
AS ALWAYS
Since Joe Biden returned to the White House, now as President of
the United States, the disciples of Leo Strauss control all the levers of the
system. “Jake” Sullivan is National Security Adviser and Antony Blinken is
Secretary of State, with Victoria Nuland as Deputy Secretary. As I have
pointed out in previous articles in this series, Victoria Nuland traveled to
Moscow in October 2021 and threatened to crush Russia's economy if Russia does
not submit. That is where the current crisis begins.
Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland brings back Dimitro
Yarosh, imposing him on Ukrainian President Volodimir Zelinki, a television
actor with no political experience... but protected by Igor Kolomoiski. On
November 2, 2021, President Zelinsky appointed Dimitro Yarosh as special
adviser to the head of the armed forces, General Valeri Zaluzhni. The
latter, a true democrat, protests, but ends up accepting Yarosh's nomination. When
questioned about this surprising association, the general refuses to answer and
says that it is a question of " national security ". Yarosh
gives his full support to the " White Fuhrer ", now
Colonel Andrei Biletsky, and to the Azov battalion, Biletsky's troops. The
Azov battalion is a copy of the SS division Das Reich and
since the summer of 2021 he has been under the command of American mercenaries
from the former Blackwater [ 14 ].
All the above information was intended to make you able to
identify the Straussians, which makes Russia's explanations more understandable.
Liberating the world from the Straussians would be the best way
to do justice to the more than a million people who have died in the wars
artificially provoked by these characters... and also to save countless lives. Whether
this intervention in Ukraine is the best way to achieve this remains to be
seen.
In any case, although the Straussians are responsible for
current events, it should be noted that those who left their hands free also
have their share of responsibility, starting with Germany and France, which
signed the Minsk Agreements -7 years ago- and that afterwards they did nothing
to force its application by Kiev.
The more than 50 states that signed the OSCE declarations
prohibiting NATO expansion beyond the Oder-Neisse line but never tried to
prevent such expansion also bear their share of responsibility. Only
Israel, which has just got rid of the Revisionist Zionists, has – so far –
expressed a nuanced position on current events.
That is one of the lessons that we must learn from this crisis:
democratically governed peoples are responsible for the decisions that their
leaders prepared for a long time and that have continued to be applied
regardless of changes in trends or by political parties that exercise the
power.
Bibliography:
[ 1 ] « Nazi leader
Dimitro Yarosh reappears as adviser to the head of the Ukrainian armed forces », Voltaire
Network , February 21, 2022.
[ 2 ] « Paul Wolfowitz,
the soul of the Pentagon », by Paul Labarique, Réseau
Voltaire , February 24, 2005.
[ 3 ] Killing Stop: The Right Attacks the CIA ,
Anne H. Cahn, Pennsylvania State University Press, 1998.
[ 4 ] The existence of this document was revealed in the
article entitled “US Strategy Plan Calls For Insuring No Rivals Develop”, by
Patrick E. Tyler, The New York Times , March 8, 1992.
See also excerpts published on page 14: «Excerpts from Pentagon's Plan:
“Prevent the Re-Emergence of a New Rival”». Additional information can
also be found in "Keeping the US First, Pentagon Would preclude a Rival
Superpower," Barton Gellman, The Washington Post ,
March 11, 1992.
[ 5 ] Silent Warfare: Understanding the World
of Intelligence , Abram N. Shulsky and Gary J. Schmitt, Potomac
Books, 1999.
[ 6 ] «Toward a neo-Reaganite Foreign Policy», Robert Kagan
and William Kristol, Foreign Affairs , July-August
1996, vol. 75 (4), p. 18-32.
[ 7 ] “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the
Realm”, Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies, 1996.
[ 8 ] " The
Rumsfeld-Cebrowski Doctrine ", by Thierry Meyssan, Voltaire
Network , May 25, 2021.
[ 9 ] « Sommet
historique pour sceller l'Alliance des guerriers de Dieu », Réseau
Voltaire , October 17, 2003.
[ 10 ] The Soldier and the State: The Theory
and Politics of Civil-Military Relations , Samuel Huntington, Belknap
Press, 1981.
[ 11 ] The controversy over Leo Strauss's disciples
continues. To write this article I mainly consulted these 8 books:
The Political Ideas of Leo Strauss , Shadia B. Drury,
Palgrave Macmillan, 1988.
Leo Strauss and the Politics of American Empire , Anne
Norton, Yale University Press, 2005.
The Truth About Leo Strauss: Political Philosophy and American
Democracy , Catherine H. Zuckert and Michael P. Zuckert,
University of Chicago Press, 2008.
Straussophobia : Defending Leo Strauss and Straussians
Against Shadia Drury and Other Accusers , Peter Minowitz, Lexington Books,
2009.
Leo Strauss and the Conservative Movement in America, Paul E.
Gottfried, Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Crisis of the Strauss Divided: Essays on Leo Strauss and
Straussianism, East and West , Harry V. Jaffa, Rowman and Littlefield,
2012.
Leo Strauss, The Straussians, and the Study of the American
Regime , Kenneth L. Deutsch, Rowman and Littlefield, 2013.
Leo Strauss and the Invasion of Iraq: Encountering the Abyss ,
Aggie Hirst, Routledge, 2013.
[ 12 ] “Who are the ancient Israeli soldiers for the
combatants of the rue dans la ville de Kiev?”, AlyaExpress-News.com, March 2,
2014; « New Gladio in
the Ukraine », by Manlio Dinucci, Il Manifesto (Italy),
Voltaire Network , March 20, 2014.
[ 13 ] « The full text of
the telephone intercept. Conversation between the Assistant Secretary of
State and the US Ambassador to Ukraine », by Andrey
Fomin, Oriental Review (Russia), Voltaire
Network , February 8, 2014.
[ 14 ] “ Exclusive:
Documents Reveal Erik Prince's $10 Billion Plan to Make Weapons and Create a
Private Army in Ukraine », Simon Shuster, Time ,
July 7, 2021.
The opinion of the author of the article does not necessarily
coincide with the opinion of the blog.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario