I.5. Others
accept an agreement with Rome
They believe that they will find in this
agreement sufficient guarantees to continue the Tradition: trust without
foundation.
From the beginning of the Tradition, Rome made
several attempts to separate priests and seminarians from the work of
Archbishop Lefebvre; He promised them the traditional mass and all the
advantages of legal recognition. Rome never kept its
promises. Archbishop Lefebvre reports on some facts.
“As
for the seminarians who left for Rome in 1977, they had been promised the
traditional mass, and then, after a time, three or four months, they were
told:“ Now you still have to adapt a bit; to stay frozen in the mass of St. Pius
V, anyway, it is necessary to open a little. And to open them, we had an
ecumenical ceremony with a Buddha on the altar ”. Then Father Daniel Séguy,
from Montauban, took the statue and smashed it on the ground. This was the end
of Léonin's seminar. " (Archbishop Lefebvre, August 1987 in Barroux)
Dom Agustín, superior of the Benedictine
monastery of Flavigny, “joined Rome (in 1985) with the hope that the Tradition,
which he would maintain in his monastery, that is, the traditional mass for his
monks, would be preserved for him, for the conventual mass. Well, Rome demanded
that for the conventual mass it be the Council mass and not the old mass.
Instead of telling him that he can keep the Tradition, they told him we are
changing the Tradition. " (Archbishop Lefebvre, Conference of June 15, 1988, Fideliter June
29-30, 1988, Ecône)
In 1986, the Mater Ecclesiae seminary
was founded to receive the deserters of Ecône. “You have no
doubt heard of him, and did some newspaper articles two years ago about the
famous slogan Deserters from Ecône, the famous deserters from Ecône! Nine
seminarians had left Ecône. The one who was in a certain way the leader of this
small rebellion, Father ..., stayed for a time in the seminary, hiding, did his
job well and managed to get eight other seminarians to leave Ecône. (It was Father Joseph Bisig who
infiltrated) Oh! It's great; it is a unique opportunity. If we promise
you wonders, there will be more to come. He said it explicitly. Cardinal
Ratzinger said:“I am happy that there are some who have left Ecône and I hope
that there are others who will follow the first. "Evil Cardinal. We
cannot trust, it is not possible." (Archbishop Lefebvre, Conference of
June 15, 1988, Fideliter June 29-30, 1988)
So how could the superior of the Society of
Saint Peter have written: “Difficulties will not be lacking, we have no
illusions. But we have already had the consoling experience that, in these
difficulties, Rome supports us effectively. And the offense that
Rome, by “dividing us”, fighting tradition with tradition, betrays a very poor
faith in the force itself of this life-giving tradition”? (Father Joseph Bisig , You are Petrus ,
March 1989)
Another wrote: “What is more important, and
what the Brotherhood does not see, is that now new men of the Church are
working, who are men of faith and who clearly manifest this faith. Monsignor
Thomas (Bishop of Versailles) is just one of them. This is another reason not
to accept a schism and I have said it publicly since the first threats made in
Ecône, a year ago. » (RP Bruno de Blignière, Christian Family ,
July 21, 1988) What blindness!(These
experiences lived by this group of priests give us a clear example of the
double standards or discourse of the modernists who occupy the Vatican today
and have plunged the Church into an unprecedented darkness in its long history
of two thousand years. This should do the trick. as a clear example for the new
hierarchs of the Neo Fraternity who are dealing with the children of the devil
because, like him, they are liars. But, unfortunately, they seem to be just
like them.)
¨ The
communities that have made this agreement with Rome
In 1988: Benedictine monastery of Sainte
Madeleine du Barroux; Brotherhood of San Pedro; Benedictine monastery
of Fontgombault and his daughters (Triors, Randol); Institute of the Holy
Cross of Riaumont; Instituto de Cristo Rey (Bishop Wach); Opus Mariae
(RP Wladimir); Benedictines of Joucques and Barroux; Dominicans from
Pontcalec; Fraternity San Vicente Ferrer de Chéméré-le-Roi, a Dominican
convent that was previously a sedevacantist.
Both are governed by the Motu Proprio Ecclesia
Dei adflicta of July 2, 1988.
In 2002: the priests of the Diocese of Campos
in Brazil, governed by a special agreement. You are going to know that
"special agreement". (Perhaps the episcopal consecration of
Mons. Fernando Rifan Arias, a double-faced man: traditional and orthodox while
Mons. de Castro Mayer lived. Already in 2000 there was an accordian atmosphere
among most of the parents that made up the San Juan Maria community. Vianey under
Bishop Lisiño Rngel, who writes this witnessed that)
On September 8, 2006, with great media
support, the Ecclesia Dei commission erected, by decree signed by Cardinal
Castrillón Hoyos, a new institute of pontifical law, the Good Shepherd
Institute.
¨ They are
called meetings
They are called "reunited" because,
in fact, as in principle, they are no longer on the side of their former
comrades in arms, but on the side of those whom they previously fought as
enemies of faith, Tradition and the social reign of Jesus Christ... We
will show below that they come together in principle by examining intentions,
voluntary submission to modernist influence, and the terms of the
agreement. They are also recovered in practice, here are some examples:
Regarding the Mass
They concelebrate and even celebrate the New
Mass, and no longer deny their opposition to the Catholic faith.
Some priests encourage the faithful to fulfill
the Sunday obligation by attending new Masses in their parish instead of
attending the old Mass in a chapel of the Society of Saint Pius X. Dom Gérard
and Bishop Wach concelebrated it with Pope John Paul II; Bishop Rifan, for
his part, concelebrated it on September 8, 2004 in Aparecida, Brazil.
Regarding the Second Vatican Council
They publish works to show that the
declaration of the Second Vatican Council on religious freedom is in full
conformity with Tradition.
They approve the new Catechism of the
Catholic Church published in 1992 and its Compendium published
in 2005: both take up the errors of the Council on religious freedom,
ecumenism, collegiality and even more.
They refer to the new 1983 Code of Canon
Law as the implementation of the Council's reforms in the life of the
Church.
Regarding the incessant contacts with the
diocesan clergy These contacts lead some to commit themselves and finally
to enter the dioceses under the authority of the bishop.
Break contact with those who continue the work
of Archbishop Lefebvre
This division comes only from them: “That the
Fraternity of Archbishop Lefebvre was wanted by God, we also believe
it. And it is precisely because we want to remain faithful to the Catholic
faith that we must leave it. Because we did not consider ourselves useless
enough servants, we believed ourselves to be indispensable.
This magnificent work was wanted by God, it is
no longer. God will give birth from dry bones - if necessary - to new
children of Israel (cf. prophetic vision of Ezekiel chap. 37). Let's never
forget. »(Collective document of the priests of the Society of Saint Peter
against consecrations, early 1989)(Unfortunately this magnificent work has taken a course very contrary
to that of its founder: they accept the Second Vatican Council, they accept the
new canon law plagued with doctrinal errors, they do not denounce the
atrocities of Francis as Bishop Lefebvre did with John XXII, Paul VI. , and
John Paul II and many other things they do that some priests and parishioners
are not aware of that continue to believe in the good "traditionalist
intention" of these traitorous leaders of said congregation. As an
example, among many, of this collusion with Rome modernist a modernist bishop
currently lives in one of the seminaries of said congregation, more
specifically in the German seminary)
Division, imposed by
Rome and the bishops
At Versailles, at the beginning of the 1988
school year, Bishop Thomas recognized the legal existence of the Abbé Porta and
Notre-Dame des Armées, for an experimental period of one year, on the express
condition that no relationship with the Fraternity be maintained… Pius X and
those who support her. Consequences Priests who have not disapproved of
consecrations are no longer allowed to enter the chapel not even to preach
during a private mass ... (Abbé Porta was, I don't remember well,
accompanying Bishop Lefebvre at the 1985 or 1986 ordinations That's where I met
him, who would have thought that, years after the death of Bishop Lefebvre, he
would go to the new church, what surprises life gives us)
Those gathered quickly understood: “I say
that they do not want us to depend on these four bishops (consecrated by
Archbishop Lefebvre). I do not care more than that because deep down the
Church does not care about these four bishops, it keeps them within itself by
its own laws. " (Dom Gérard, Radio Courtoisie, August 28, 1988)
This division is imposed by the Pope himself
in his Motu proprio of July 2, 1988: “so that they fulfill the grave duty
that corresponds to them to remain united to the Vicar of Christ in the unity
of the Catholic Church, and that they do not dare to continue supporting this
movement, in any way ...”(John Paul II's Motu proprio, July 2, 1988)
II - Intentions
The intentions of the attempted agreement
between Rome and Archbishop Lefebvre are opposed. Therefore, no agreement
is possible.
On the other hand, there is a convergence of
intentions between the priests of the Fraternity and Rome ...
II.1. Archbishop Lefebvre
¨ Restore
Tradition to honor it and give it back in the Church the place it deserves
This is not a diplomatic agreement to
force the meeting
“For fifteen years we have been in dialogue to
try to restore honor to Tradition, in the place it deserves in the
Church. We have met with continued rejection. What Rome now grants in
favor of tradition is just a purely political and diplomatic gesture to
force demonstrations. But it is not a conviction of the benefits of
Tradition. »(Archbishop Lefebvre, Fideliter ,
n ° 79, January-February 1991, p. 4; cf. Fideliter ,
n ° 70, July-August 1989, p. 4)
· But give the
means to develop freely Tradition
“In order to stop the self-demolition of the
Church, we ask the Holy Father, through you, to provide the free exercise of
tradition by providing tradition with the means to live and develop for the
salvation of the Catholic Church and the salvation of souls, that the works of
tradition are recognized, in particular the seminaries, and that HE Bishop
Castro-Mayer and I give ourselves the auxiliaries of our choice to keep the
Church in the Church. Graces of Tradition, the only source of renewal for
the Church. »(Letter from Archbishop Lefebvre to Cardinal Ratzinger, July
8, 1988, Fideliter June 29-30, 1988, p. 25)
· Continue the
work undertaken: the priesthood
“God raised up the priestly Fraternity of
Saint Pius X for the maintenance and perpetuity of his glorious and expiatory
sacrifice in the Church. He chose himself true priests, educated and convinced
of these divine mysteries. God gave me the grace to prepare these Levites and
grant them priestly grace for the perseverance of the true sacrifice, according
to the definition of the Council of Trent.
This is what the persecution of the antichrist
brought us to Rome. This modernist and liberal Rome continues its
destructive work of the Kingdom of Our Lord as evidenced by Assisi and the
confirmation of the liberal theses of Vatican II on religious freedom. I
am obliged by divine Providence to transmit the grace of the Catholic
episcopate that I have received, so that the Church and the Catholic priesthood
continue to exist for the glory of God and the salvation of souls.
" (Letter to future bishops August 29, 1987, Fideliter June
29-30, 1988).
¨ Examine if
Rome sincerely wishes to protect Tradition
“During the last contacts I had in Rome, I
tried several times to probe his intentions, to measure if there was a real
change. This did not seem impossible after observing the catastrophic and
disastrous failures that followed the Council and also after the visit of
Cardinal Gagnon and Bishop Perl, who had observed the fruits of the good work
of the Fraternity. (…) If I went to Rome to discuss it, it is because I wanted
to try to see if we could reach an agreement with the ecclesiastical
authorities, protecting ourselves from their liberalism and safeguarding
Tradition. It was clear to me that no agreement could be reached that would
give us both the guarantee and the conviction that Rome sincerely wanted to
contribute to the preservation of Tradition. " (¿Archbishop
Lefebvre, Fideliter n ° 68 p.7(¿Today in 2021, it is seen more clearly that modernist
Rome IS NOT GOING TO CHANGE, on the contrary, it attacked tradition with an
unprecedented and diabolical fury when publishing that nefarious letter
“Tradicionis Custodes” and what did the Neo Fraternity do? I pass with a
flaccid and "ultra catholic" answer that does not convince more than
the naive who still believe that those who govern it defend the integrity of
the doctrine, a false and treacherous lie for the true tradition)
I have already uploaded several articles and
each time I am surprised to see the firmness in faith, doctrine and tradition
of a more than great a holy Archbishop who remained irreducible in his
convictions until death.
For today I do not believe that there is a
bishop of the same size and height as this holy champion of the faith, those of
us who want to maintain that his irreducible position feel, in truth, like
orphans and praying to God that this prolonged period ends. nightmare that
began in the disastrous Second Vatican Council, the horizon is darker than
ever, we feel that the cursed modernism encompasses everything and only a ray
of light gives us encouragement together with these testimonies of a true
Catholic Archbishop. We feel a breath in the most intimate of our hearts, of
those who in life converged with their seminarians and later ordained us
priests. How we long for his spiritual and doctrinal talks! Those who did not
know or treat him have in these articles the worthy fight that, for Our Lord
Jesus Christ,His Blessed Mother and the Holy Church, gave this holy prelate during
his last years of life. May God grant that these articles give them the
strength that modernism has taken away from them. R. P. ARTURO VARGAS
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario