Note. In a previous publication on this same topic, as interesting as the writings of Luisa Picarreta, a comment on the previous article asked me to give more information from the theological point of view and with more explicit quotes from the Magisterium of the Church in where I exposed the authors of the heresies that Luisa Picarreta exposes in her writings, thank God I was able to prosecute the Picarreta affair in greater depth.
Warning. What is enclosed in
parentheses and highlighted in yellow is the work of the editor and not the
author of the writing.
“But it must be recognized that in
recent times the number of the enemies of the cross of Christ has grown in a
strange way, who, with entirely new arts and full of perfidy, are striving to
annihilate the vital energies of the Church., and even by totally destroying,
if possible, the kingdom of Jesus Christ. Keeping silence is no longer
decorous, if we do not want to appear unfaithful to the most sacrosanct of our
duties, and if the goodness that we have used up to now, with the hope of
amendment, is no longer to be censured as a neglect of our ministry. What,
above all, demands of us that we break the silence without delay is that today
it is no longer necessary to search for the makers of errors among the declared
enemies: they hide themselves, and this is the object of great pain and
anguish, in the bosom and union of the Church itself, being enemies all the
more damaging when they are less declared. (Encyclical Pascendi Gregis of His
Holiness Saint Pius X)
Following the norm of this extract
from the Encyclical, it is necessary to raise one's voice about the errors
(converted into modern devotion as opposed to the true devotion maintained for
centuries in the true Church) that have already taken root in many souls of
good will and have adhered to this seer passing the limits, without meaning to,
of the Holy Divine Revelation. I know from experience that many will not like
what has been done here with hard work to gather the overwhelming evidence
against this "seer." These tests are in total accordance with the
tradition of the Church, Catholic theology and divine Revelation and, whoever
writes this also a priest by the grace of God, fully agrees with Father Rafael
OSBFor a long time this was dropped or its due importance was taken away or the
very seriousness of these "revelations" was completely ignored.
Whoever reads this should not be scandalized or rant against those who wrote
this with the sole purpose of saving their souls by pointing out the enemy of
the Catholic FAITH. God Our Lord grant them patience and humility to accept
what is proven here with forceful arguments and it is necessary to go to the
end to form a complete opinion about the danger of these so-called
“revelations”.God Our Lord grant them patience and humility to accept what is
proven here with forceful arguments and it is necessary to go to the end to
form a complete opinion about the danger of these so-called “revelations”.God
Our Lord grant them patience and humility to accept what is proven here with
forceful arguments and it is necessary to go to the end to form a complete
opinion about the danger of these so-called “revelations”.
On the octave of Easter. RV Father A. Vargas.
Revised and augmented with notes from the
Magisterium of the Church on the Vigil of the Assumption of Mary Most Holy.
There are real heresies in the
writings of Luisa Picarreta that we will explain in a moment.
Heresies:
1) The first and main heresy is that
which goes against Revelation Divine that which was bequeathed to us
by Jesus Christ with the death of the last apostle Saint John, with him the
deposit fidei as it is commonly called was closed. Now, private revelations,
since these are not contained either explicitly or implicitly, will be taken,
according to the Latin adage, tantum quantum or as much as they serve the
salvation of the soul and as much as they distance us from God will be left
without it. necessarily implies the salvation of the soul. Therefore, Luisa
Picarreta's revelations fall within this as much as and in no way or under any
circumstances condition, much less can they be "superior to Deposito
Fidei" to affirm the opposite, as she says in her books, it is to directly
attempt against the very deposit of the Faith which is reckless of heresy and
contrary to what is taught by the Catholic Church here and everywhere. Hence,
what she claims to have received from Almighty God is a "New
Revelation" conditioning her only to her writings without making any
reference to the deposit of faith. This heresy is sustained, among others, by
the Modernist heresy embedded in the Catholic Church founded by Jesus Christ.
2) The second heresy in which Luisa
Picarreta incurs is the so-called MONOTELITE promoted by Sergio Patriarch of
Constantinople around the year of the Lord of 634 (From letter 1: Scripta
Fraternitatis vestrae Sergio, Patriarch of Constantinople Dz 251) Heresy that
denies the two natures in Christ Jesus and admits only one such as the divine
to the detriment of the human. This heretical way of expressing himself about
the two natures of Jesus Christ was refuted at the time by the Council of
Chalcedon (cf Denzinger 146) and, later condemned by the Council of Letran (Dz
258-267)
3) The third heresy contained in the
books of this author is the MONOPHYSITE who
categorically affirm that in Jesus Christ there was only one will contrary to
the sentiment of Saint SOFRONIO who defended against Pope Honorius the two
wills in Jesus Christ and the sentiment of the Church (DZ 251 AND 1465) The
heresy of these consisted in affirming that in Christ there was in effect only
one will, the Divine Will, and that the human will of Christ was totally
absorbed by the Divinity. His heresiarch was Bishop Sergius, bishop of
Constantinople. (Actually,
Patriarch Sergio promoted Monophysitism, not Monotelism, however, it is
attributed to him for having supported those who professed this heresy and to
Honorius I for giving his consent) This "absorption"
then cannot happen. It is impossible for the will of any person to be absorbed by
the Divine Will. Free will is suppressed in us, which is an
aberration. (Santo Tomas de
Aquino in his treatise of INCARNATE VERB of the theological sum is about the
free will of Jesus Christ to the I refer to the readers for a greater knowledge
of this question) And that is exactly what Luisa teaches over
and over again in her "revelations." Luisa teaches clearly and
repeatedly that when one receives this new "Sacrament" of the Divine
Will, the human will ceases to function as such, leaving only the Divine Will
in us, here it refers to a gross error of nature attributed to Jesus Christ who
is the highest perfection and do not in any way dig the imperfection. God
sovereign creator and redeemer respects in the common man his free will with
which that same man can freely choose between good and evil. Now, if God does
this with any man, why would his Son deny his incarnate WORD this free will
once he was made MAN? Therefore, in light of Catholic theology (Suma Teológica
de Santo Tomas: treatise of INCARNATE VERB) ON THIS TOPIC Luisa Picarreta is
totally wrong, necessarily incurring heresy by stubbornly confirming her
aforementioned “theory”, that is, Monotelism.
4) The fourth heresy is called Quietism. Before
continuing with this other heresy we must distinguish between the Molinist
quietism of Luis Molina (Dz 1097) and the quietism of Miguel de Molinos, (under the title: "Errors of Miguel de
Molinos" the Magisterium of the Church condemns by decree of 28 of August
and ratifies this condemnation in the Constitution Caelestis Pastor, of
November 20, 1687, you can read all its errors condemned in Dz. 2221 to 2288,
because of its breadth it is very long and we cannot cite them all here, but I
strongly recommend reading them because it is very interesting to know the
mistakes that this Jesuit priest made.
For this Molinist Quietism, there
are two ways to reach God: through speech and meditation; and through interior
recollection and contemplation. It was an esoteric-elitist dualistic
conception. Miguel de Molinos considered that his model of faith was superior,
the other inferior; for this reason he criticized the scholastic method and the
spiritual fathers, who defended a type of conceptual and external faith.
The Molinist
doctrine represents the self-denial of the Self taken to its maximum extreme:
personal annihilation as a space of relationship with God. To achieve inner
peace, it is necessary to renounce one's own will and submit unconditionally to
the divine will, eliminating all vestige of self-love and self-esteem: “This
seven-headed hydra of self-love has to be slaughtered to reach the summit of
the high mountain of peace”. Whoever loves God cannot love himself: "There
is no happiness in enjoying but in suffering with quietude and
resignation."
Luisa Picarreta clung to this error,
already condemned by the Church, as we have seen, who teaches, faithfully
following Miguel de Molinos, interior annihilation and, by this means,
"holiness" is achieved. In addition, it affirms that our free
will is not responsible for our actions, thus denying the morality of said actions
(eg. If one sins against the sixth commandment in this state that she proposes,
he does not commit a sin because his free will simply does not work or is
"discontinued")
Faced with these "new"
aberrations coming from a heretical mind, as we have seen. The Church reacted
by condemning their mistakes.
“On Wednesday July 13, 1938, in
the General Session of the Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office, the
most Eminent and Reverend Cardinals, concerned about the defense of the faith
and good morals, following the previous recommendation of the Reverend
Consultors, They have CONDEMNED and ordered the following works written by
Luisa Picarreta and published by others at different times in various places to
be inserted into the Index of Prohibited Books:
1. The Contemplation of the Passion
of Our Lord Jesus Christ, together with a Treatise on the Divine Will.
2. The Kingdom of the Divine Will.
3. The Queen of Heaven in the Kingdom
of the Divine Will.
The following Thursday, July 14 of
the same month and year, Our Most Holy Father, Pius XI, Pope for Divine
Providence, in the usual audience that he granted to the Most Excellent and
Reverend Advisers of the Holy Office, approved the decision of the Most Eminent
Cardinals, and confirmed and ordered its publication” (Acta Apostolicae Sedis,
August 30, 1938).
CATHOLIC PRINCIPLES
TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT:
1.- The Christian faith cannot accept
“revelations” that seek to overcome or correct the Revelation that effectively
closed with the death of the last Apostle, Saint John the Evangelist. (To
say then that these private revelations have more importance than the divine
ones, disregarding the Supreme Pontiff Pius XI, is to go against the
two-thousand-year tradition of the Catholic Church and against the same DIVINE
revelation WHICH RAYS IN THE HEREGY)
2- The teaching given in any private
revelation must be submitted to the Holy Scriptures and Tradition to prove
it. (In this submission to divine revelation the false and true doctrine
is tested. "Private revelation is never about the DIVINE, taking a
position contrary to the latter is a reckless act of eternal consequences)
3.- Jesus Christ and the apostles
gave us everything we need for our salvation and sanctification towards the
highest perfection. Teachings that have been faithfully transmitted by the
Catholic Church.
Following the order established
above, Picarreta attempts against the first point that is the DIVINE REVELATION
when he says the following in his works
1. Jesus to Luisa: “I wish to issue a
third FIAT as I cannot contain my Love anymore. This will complete the work I
started. Otherwise the work of both Creation and Redemption would be
incomplete. ¨ (BH, p. 119). A new FIAT is contrary to the one that is written
in the Gospel of Saint John and that reaffirms the perfection of the redemptive
work when it says CONSUMATUM EST. EVERYTHING IS CONSUMED. To suppose a new FIAT
outside of the deposit of faith is an unprecedented audacity since it would
suppose the imperfection of the redemption and it would go against the divine
perfections exposed by Santo Tomas in his theological summation in his
Trinitate treatise. In addition, it is to go against his divine wisdom and his
divine providence or government of the universe in all times and circumstances,
It goes without saying that these "words" of Jesus Christ to this
woman are inadmissible and heretical.
2. Jesus to Luisa: “There will be
neither before nor after you, no creature towards whom I will oblige, by
necessity, the help of my ministers”. This proposition goes beyond the Molinism
of Miguel de Molina because it goes directly against the sacrament of penance
and extreme unction, which, as we know, are of divine institution, the
quotations of such institutions are in the Gospel of Saint John with these
words: "Receive the Holy Spirit, everything you bind on earth will be
bound in heaven and everything you untie on earth will be loosed in heaven
"and Santiago Apóstol:" He who is sick call the priests to anoint him
with the oil of the Salvation". This proposition is also similar to the
Protestants in that they reject the sacrament of penance. We are not bound by
necessity to follow these private revelations without detriment to the
salvation of our souls.
3. Jesus to Luisa: “My mother has
supremacy over the whole Church. I have done the same with you… everything
that I reveal to you about my Will: the Goods it contains and how the creature
must enter it and how paternal goodness wants to open another era of grace.
" (BH p. 14)
COMMENT: Luisa claims to have
received a new “deposit of faith” that parallels the revelation given to the
apostles. Saint Thomas teaches the opposite: “There is a triple state of
humanity; the first was under the old Law; the second is that of the
new Law; the third will not take place in this life, but in Heaven… we
should not expect a state in which man possesses the grace of the Holy Spirit
more perfectly than he has possessed him up to now. " (Summa I-II,
106).
Against Saint Thomas is again the
“revelation” of Luisa by “Jesus”: “These revelations regarding my Will will be
like a balm to heal the wounds produced by the human will. Whoever has the
benefit of this knowledge will feel the flow of a new life of light, grace and
strength to fulfill my Will in everything ... My daughter, the Kingdom of my
Will is invisible. In these writings I have placed superabundant light, grace,
and attraction to make my kingdom victorious. IN THE PROPORTION THAT THESE
WRITINGS ARE KNOWN, they will wage a sweet battle against the human will and
win. " (p.16,BH) (Against principles 1 and 3) The Church venerates the Blessed
Virgin Mary as the only perfect creature for the great privilege of being the
Mother of God and this exaltation is above all creatures so it says in Saint
Luke chap. 1. V. 42: "Blessed are you among women and blessed is the fruit
of your womb" and later the virgin herself says: "For this reason all
generations will call me blessed." Regarding the latter, we could say,
according to her, that redemption does not bring all the benefits that are said
in her book, which is contrary to what Saint Peter says in his letter: "By
his wounds we have been healed" and in another side:"Without the
effusion of blood there is no remission" Whereby we can conclude that the
death of Jesus Christ gave us the suffering graces not only for this world but
also the special grace that opens the doors of heaven for us.
4. Jesus to Luisa: “Even this way I
ask you to pray is not found in any other” (p. 19, BH).
COMMENT: Here it will be enough for
the Magisterium to answer for us: “Let the understanding, knowledge and wisdom
of individuals as well as of all, of a man as of the whole Church, grow and
progress strongly with the passing of the ages and the centuries; but it only
has to be in its own genre, that is, in the same dogma, with the same meaning
and the same understanding ". (Dz 1800). Confirming this, Saint Paul says:
“I marvel that so soon you turn away from the one who called you by the grace
of Christ, and you go to another Gospel. And it is not that there is another
Gospel, but rather that there are those who disturb you and pretend to pervert
the Gospel of Christ. But, even if we ourselves, or an angel from heaven
preached to you a different Gospel than the one we have announced to you, BE
ANATEMA.Whereby the deception of the devil is exposed with these two quotes from
the Magisterium of the Church and from Saint Paul.
5. Jesus to Luisa: “The soul that
does my Will in accordance with the perfection that I taught you… she will
surpass all the other Saints… because by remaining in my Will, they will act in
a divine, secret and extraordinary way” (BH , p 38).
COMMENT: This proposition is
absolutely quietist of Molinist origin as expressed above about it. At this
point, I think it is the third, it is interesting to read the theses condemned
by the Church on this heretical doctrine, condemned centuries before this
genius of Picarreta appeared saying something as new as old at the same time, I
will quote some passages from Miguel de Molinos on this error of Picarreta: “To
want to act actively is to offend God, who wants to be the only agent; and
therefore it is necessary to abandon oneself entirely and entirely in God, and
then remain as a lifeless body (Dz. 1222) “By doing nothing, the soul
annihilates itself and returns to its own origin, which is the essence of God,
in which it remains transformed and divinized, and God remains in himself;
because then they are no longer two things united, but only one and in this way
God lives and reigns in us and the soul annihilates itself in the operative
being. (Dz. 1225) In the last words enters the Monophysite heresy that denies
the two wills in Christ Jesus and suppresses free will in us.
6. “I (Luisa), upon hearing this,
said to myself: 'Soon He will say that His Will is more than the Sacramental
Communion itself.' Then He immediately added: “Right! Correct! Because
sacramental communion lasts a few minutes. It is temporary, My Will, on the
other hand, is the perennial Communion. " (p.36 BH).
COMMENT: This is completely wrong.
Although the Eucharist in terms of its accidents of bread and wine last a few
minutes, it is not so in terms of the spiritual order that lasts for a long
time as long as the soul does not lose grace and it is considered an increase
in it thanks to this permanence. spiritual in our souls. On the other hand,
communion is not the end of our pilgrimage on earth but the means to achieve
eternal life, therefore, with all property we can say that the Eucharist is not
the eternal home of the soul but the spiritual food to reach to this eternal
abode. Nuances of Monotelism and quietism are found in this proposition by
Picarreta.
7. Jesus to Luisa: “Ah, I repeat to
you and I confirm that my Will is a sacrament and surpasses all the sacraments
together in a much more admirable way, since it does not need the intervention
of anyone or anything material. The Sacrament of my Will is formed between my
Will and the will of a soul. When both wills merge with each other, they form
the Sacrament. " (P. 106, BH).
COMMENT: This proposition is not in
accordance with scholastic theology because, according to the definition of
man, the two actions of the soul are distinguished, such as intelligence and
will, and since Jesus Christ is the Man-God, these two actions of the soul also
exist in Him… Then to pretend that this human will emanating from human nature
is a much greater and unique sacrament and sacrament, discarding the sacraments
instituted by Jesus Christ himself, is aberrant and heretical and sounds like
monothelianism and monophysitism. Finally, due to the hypostatic union in Jesus
Christ, the divine nature cannot be separated from the human nature nor can one
be suppressed to the detriment of the other, it would be a destruction or
annihilation which is impossible in God. (theological sum treatise of Incarnate
Word)
8. “When a soul acts in my Will, its
humanity is, so to speak, suspended. Then the Divine Life of my Love takes
its place and acts ”. (p. 86, BH).
"This is how the soul, until it
is buried in my Will and dies completely in It, its will disintegrates in
Mine" (p. 28 BH).
COMMENTS: It is the heresy of
Quietism. Annihilation of ourselves when we put ourselves in God's hands. Saint
Athanasius explains: “The human will will neither resist nor doubt, but will
always submit to the omnipotent Divine Will. Because it is necessary for the
will of the flesh to act, but being subject to the divine Will. " Before
creation we were only ideas in the mind or divine intellect lacking being, but
at least we subsisted in it as something that would be later, once created we
stop being an idea in God and we become something outside of Him, that is to
say , a being either animal or vegetable, but we are something, but Picarreta
reduces us to something that God is impossible to do, ANNIHILATION, that is,NOT
BEING NOTHING that expresses the word annihilation in the strict sense
(Theological sum treaty of creation)
9. “Jesus said to me: 'My dear, look
how for the one who lives in my Will there is no grace that comes out of my
Will towards all the creatures in Heaven or on earth in which he (that is, he
who lives in the Divine Will) is not the first to participate. This is
natural because he who lives in his father's house abounds in his
possessions. And if those on the outside receive something, it is by
virtue of the one who lives inside”. (p.25 BH).
COMMENTS: ¡Obviously for Luisa,
living in the Divine Will is joining Our Lady as Mediatrix of all graces! (??).
10.-After her confessor rejected her
Absolution, Luisa, however, received Holy Communion. After that refusal she
tells us that Jesus told her not to worry… “Because once a person is freed from
his own human will and given to my Divine Will, there is no need for a priestly
absolution, since this it will be given to you by your loving Jesus”. (BH, Vol.
16. November 5, 1923)
COMMENTS: Excellent example of the
heresies of Monotelism and Quietism. By doing this act of
"abandonment to the Divine Will", one will be automatically justified
without the need to practice religion at all! Where is the dogma of
original sin, where are the current sins that are committed daily while we are
in this world and we are not confirmed in grace as the Blessed Virgin Mary,
Saint John the Baptist and the apostles after Pentecost?
CONCLUSION:
Luisa Picareta's Divine Will is more
than heresy. It is a completely new religion that has a mixture of
Protestantism, Modernism, Buddhism, Monotelism, and Quietism. These
heresies destroy human responsibility for one's actions. This new religion
"reveals" the "magic formula" for becoming essentially equal
with God. Satan's slogan wielded against Adam and Eve. I already said
that this smells like SULFUR
Note 1.- BH = Translated from
the English version of the book:
When the Divine
Will Reign in souls, Book of Heaven: A selection of Passages. Luisa Piccarreta
Center for the Divine Will. Jacksonville, FL. nineteen ninety five.
Partager:
Father Rafael OSB
Review and expansion: Father Arturo Var gas Meza
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario