Note. Perhaps many of our readers do not understand the moral and theological approach that is being given to the question of the covi-19 vaccine due to the little doctrinal preparation on the subject. This despite the numerous examples and repetitions made on purpose for your correct understanding, we suggest to please and wisely ask the editor since the author of the article is Italian.
Medical awareness
There are hundreds of scientific
publications on this subject and I refer the reader to them, which have been
summarized at http://wwwrenovatio21.com of November 22, 2020.
Regarding the vaccine for covid-19, the
researchers also teach that it contains microorganisms that can modify human
behavior, that is, DNA, causing it to be controlled remotely as if it were a
robot, so there is also this other problem ethical, that of artificial
intelligence, nanotechnology together with graphene.
Moral Theolog
Recently
a study has been published in the United States (Cf. Fraternidad San Pío X)
that, to resolve the question of whether it is lawful or not to be vaccinated,
applies the doctrine studied in Moral Theology a) on action with double effect,
is say, about the material and formal aspect. and b) on only material
cooperation with the formal sin of others. The one that they consider that
there is no mortal sin and, therefore, the vaccine could be licit.
Is it lawful to a) carry out an action,
from which two effects are expected to derive: one good or at least indifferent
and the other bad, and then b) only materially cooperate with the possible sin
committed by others?
Moral
Theology (cf. Suma Theológica, I-II, qq. 18-20) teaches that an indirect
voluntary act (or in cause) is morally bad, if the agent foresees at least in a
confusing way the bad effect of the good act or indifferent (for example, if I
drink I foresee that I will get drunk and blaspheme, however, despite this I
drink and blaspheme, even though I am stunned without having full warning and
deliberate consent to the act of blaspheming. Thus, the blasphemy was
intentional or indirect and therefore I have seriously sinned).
However, exceptionally, moralists add that
this can only be lawful if four conditions are met: 1 °) the act must be good
in itself, if it is bad it is prohibited as sinful; 2 °) the operating subject
must point to the good effect and not to the bad one, that is, it must have a
morally good intention and the bad effect must not be wanted or foreseen
directly, but only allowed indirectly; 3 °) the two effects should not be
connected to each other so that the good effect (end) is born from the bad
(means), since evil cannot be done to obtain the good, the good end does not
justify the bad means; 4 °) there must be a serious, just and proportionate
reason to allow and not want the bad effect. (For example; a man injured in the
leg whose wound must be cauterized and in the absence of anesthesia he is given
an alcoholic drink, the act is good in itself, the patient does not want to get
drunk but to heal whose effect is good, in the third room the effect is good:
that the leg does not get gangrene despite the fact that alcohol is bad and,
finally, it is tried to avoid gangrene and the possible amputation of the leg)
Material cooperation in the formal
sin of others
Formal cooperation, whether direct or
positive to the sin of others, is always illicit in itself; indirect and
negative material cooperation may be permissible under certain conditions. In
fact, [in material cooperation] it is not an action in the strict sense of the
word, but a negative behavior (silence, tolerance) in the face of the sin of
others; Failure to act does not establish any causality and does not imply any
guilt in the wrong that others do. However, it is an omission, so if there is a
duty to act and speak, then the omission can become a sin. It is only lawful if
the rules of the indirect volunteer (or in causa) or on the allowance of
harmful effects in a morally good act are verified.
The indirect volunteer (or in causa) exists
when something is not wanted in itself, but is only allowed to happen; however,
if something is wanted as a means to an end (for example, aborting the fetus to
treat the mother or to produce a vaccine) the action is not lawful. If the
effect of the volunteer in question is bad, it is imputed to the agent, if he
predicted it at least confusingly (for example, Noah, who was unaware of the
effects of wine, was not guilty of his intoxication. According to the Holy Bible,
Noah planted a vineyard and With its fruit he made a wine which he drank
without measure and was totally drunk, but he was ignorant of the effects of
this action so it was not imputed to sin) and if he had the power to prevent
the cause (if they block me with force and They make a bottle of liquor drink
violently, I am not guilty of drunkenness).
Moralists
explain that in material cooperation the action is not directed to the sin of
others, (to whom their cooperation to sin was formal in making said bad vaccine
by itself) but rather the action of the cooperator (eg the act to be
vaccinated) is enjoyed by the sinner (e.g. making vaccinations with aborted
fetuses) without the knowledge of the cooperator, as a pure physical action
without any moral consent (for example, if I sell a knife to someone who will
kill another with it, without my having foreseen it; in the same way I
vaccinate myself without knowing that the vaccine contains aborted fetuses).
But unfortunately, it is not spared the side effects of a bad, lousy, and
hellish vaccine.
The case of formal cooperation is different, but only implicit, that is, it is not desired internally, but it collaborates physically and externally, even though the act is intrinsically bad (for example, a nurse sins if she collaborates physically with the doctor in abortion, even if he does not approve of it morally and inwardly; a Christian sins if he sacrifices outwardly to idols, even though inwardly he pretends to hate idolatry). In fact, it is never allowed to do outwardly something that is sinful in itself, even though it disagrees internally.
Divine
Revelation (2nd Book of Maccabees, 6:18 ff.) Recounts the magnificent and very
current example that the ninety-year-old scribe Eleazar gave us, recounted in
the Holy Scriptures, who preferred to die rather than pretend only to eat pork
In fact, when the Syrians opened his mouth to force him to eat pork, impure
meat, he resisted; since the Jews present, who loved him, gave him pure meat,
telling him to pretend to eat pork, he replied that he could not pretend, that
he would become a pagan if he did so and preferred to be martyred ...
"Where are the Maccabees?" Monsignor Lefebvre wondered sadly after
the pan-ecumenical day in Assisi in April 1986.
Material cooperation in the formal sin of others may be lawful, but it must go back to the indirect voluntary and the bad effect of a good act. In practice, it is necessary to consider, if they exist, the four conditions that we have seen previously, since only in this case is it permissible to materially cooperate with the formal sin of others.
Furthermore,
if the act has only negative effects, it is always illegal. Now, many
scientists believe that the Covid-19 vaccine does not have any positive
elements, but there are many elements, if not all, that are seriously dangerous
to health. These are: abortifacient serum, graphene, nanoparticles, and the
enzyme that alters human A.D.N.
1)
the act must be good in itself, if it is bad it is prohibited as sinful:
inoculating a liquid made with explicitly aborted fetuses to package the
vaccine is a bad act. This first condition alone makes the act of vaccination
immoral and illegal. Furthermore, the COVID-19 vaccine was conceived from the
perspective of Transhumanism, which aims to create man with artificial
intelligence instead of God: "Eritis sicut dii - You will be like
gods" (Gen. 3: 5). Finally, the side effects of vaccines are very
dangerous to health.
For which there are already reliable cases of secondary physical, mental and even death consequences from the vaccine.
Therefore,
double effect cause cannot be applied to vaccination.
WARNING.
If the article is not understood on its first reading, please read it a second
or third time. Thank you.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario