Dimitri Orlov is an American citizen of Russian
origin, who has lived in Boston since he was a child, what he says is
especially interesting, especially if you are a US citizen. I for my part
neither remove nor put anything. Born in 1962 in Leningrad, today St.
Petersburg, he is a Russian-American engineer and writer on topics related to
the "potential economic and political decline and the collapse of the
United States", what he has called "permanent crisis."
Dimitri Orlov argues that this collapse will be the
result of huge military budgets, government deficits, an irresponsible
political system and the progressive decline in oil. This is what Dimitri Orlov
says, addressing the people and rulers of the United States, they have to know
that Russia is ready to respond to any provocation, but the last thing the
Russians want is another war. They have already caused two very big ones and
they know what a people suffers in the face of these two wars imposed against
them and this friend, if you like good news, it is the news that you are going
to hear in this article, because it is the only front that it can put out the
fire of a possible third world war, an idea that already hangs in the air.
In the United States, the current cold war is
activated and the anti-Russian rhetoric that flows from a campaign since
Clinton's time, is constantly repeated by the media, about the famous red
danger; consequently, many people are beginning to believe that a total nuclear
exchange, followed by a nuclear winter, would inevitably lead to human
extinction. It seems that many people in the United States like to think that
way, a kind of divine fatality imposed by them being the "chosen ones,"
but the reality is quite another.
The cobweb in the eyes of Americans is falling away,
allowing them to see their country in serious trouble, but without rationally
looking for the causes why. The United States is spiraling straight into
financial and political collapse, losing its position in the world and becoming
a ghetto the size of a continent, rife with drug abuse, violence, and a
decaying social base. Its vicious population, this poisoned with genetically
modified food, is morbidly obese and constantly violated by its own predatory
police, who turns out to be underhanded in their counties and in complicity
with the medical, educational and even real estate sectors, as we already know.
We also know how painful it is to realize that
America is hopelessly damaged and to accept the fact that most of the damage is
self-inflicted. The endless and useless wars, the boundless corruption of
monetary policy, the toxic culture and gender wars, the imperial arrogance and
willful ignorance that underlies it all.
This level of disconnect between what is expected
and what is observed certainly hurts, but the pain can be avoided, for a time,
through massive deception. This obvious type of downward spiral is not even
allowed to automatically spell "Apocalypse", given the peculiarity of
the state cult of the United States, by superimposing what is a religiosity of
yesteryear with the secular religion of progress, leaving no possibility that
there may be other options. Either they raise their morale by incentivized to build
colonies on Mars, or they resign themselves to perishing in a ball of fire;
given that the humiliation of having to ask the Russians for permission to fly
to the international Soyus space station, makes the prospects of realizing
American space stations seem even more difficult.
And so most of the recent US vs. Asia-Russia
warmongers can be explained by the desire to find someone other than oneself to
be guilty of one's disappearance. This is a well-understood, shadow-casting
psychological movement where one takes everything that one hates, but cannot
admit onto oneself, and projects it onto another. On a subconscious level and
in the case of some very stupid, even conscientious people, they expect the
Americans themselves to bomb Russia until the fire blazes, but they cannot do
so because Russia would strike back immediately. Americans must be aware that
they can inspire that same desire in Russia and how they have to believe that
they are good while Russia is evil,This makes the scene of an apocalypse seem
more likely than we may believe.
But this way of thinking implies a break with
reality, there is exactly one nation in the world that attacks other countries
and this is definitely the United States, it destroyed for free just because it
could Japan, which was willing to surrender anyway. It prepared to attack
Russia at the beginning of the cold war, but was held back by the large enough
number of Russian nuclear bombs at that time. He later tried to render Russia
defenseless in the face of a nuclear attack with the Anti-Ballistic Missile
treaty in 2002, but Russia's new weapons prevented him from doing so.
These include, but are not limited to, long-range
supersonic cruise missiles (Kalibre) and suborbital inter-orbital missiles that
carry multiple nuclear charges capable of evasive maneuvers as they approach
their targets (Sarmat). All of these weapons are impossible to intercept using
any conceivable defense technology. At the same time, Russia has also developed
its own defensive weapons and its latest S-500 defensive system will
effectively seal off Russia's airspace, being able to intercept targets close
to the ground and in low earth orbit.
While the United States has wasted a fantastic sum
of money fattening its notoriously corrupt defense system with various versions
of "star wars," none of that money has been particularly well spent.
The two Aegis Ashore stations in Europe, completed in Romania, planned in
Poland, will not help against "Kalibre" missiles launched from
submarines or small ships in the Pacific or in the Atlantic, near US coasts, or
against intercontinental missiles that they can fly around them. The THAAD
installation currently in South Korea will not change the situation either.
There is exactly one nuclear aggressor
nation on the planet and this is not Russia and this should not matter despite
US efforts to undermine it, the logic of mutually assured destruction still
prevails. The possibility of a nuclear exchange is not determined by anyone's
policy, but by the probability that it will occur by accident, since there is a
winning strategy in a nuclear war, no one has any reason to try to start one.
Under no circumstances will the United
States ever dictate its terms to Russia threatening it with nuclear
annihilation, if a nuclear war is not at stake, how about a conventional
one? The United States has been making noise with its troops and
conducting exercises in the Baltic states, right on the western border of
Russia, installing ABM systems in Romania, Poland, and South Korea, supporting
anti-Russian Ukrainian Nazis, etc., this all seems quite provocative, can it
result in a war? And what would that war be like? Here we must refer to Russia
and see how Russia has responded to the previous provocations.
These are the facts that we know and
that we can use to predict what would happen in opposition to purely fictitious
conjectural statements, which are not related to known facts, such as when the
United States or its representatives attack an enclave of Russian citizens
outside of the Russia's borders, here are the types of response we've been able
to observe so far:
1.- The example of Georgia; During the
Summer Olympics in Beijing (a traditional time of peace) the Georgian military,
armed and trained by the United States and Israel, invaded South Ossetia, this
region was part of Georgia only by name, mostly inhabited by Russian speakers
and with Russian passports. Georgian troops began bombing their capital,
TEJINVALI, killing Russian peacekeepers stationed in the region and causing
civilian casualties. In response, Russian troops reached Georgia in a matter of
hours, completely eliminating Georgia's military capabilities.
They announced that South Ossetia was no longer part
of Georgia, overthrowing Abkhazia, (another disputed Russian enclave) and
withdrew. Georgia's warmongering president Sakashvili was declared a “political
corpse” and left his place (fleeing as a vile coward from the new Georgian
authorities), finally, he was forced to flee Georgia, where he was declared a
fugitive from justice. The US state department recently gave him a new job, as
governor of Odessa in Ukraine. Currently Russian-Georgian relations have been
improving.
2.- The example of Crimea; During the
Olympic games in Sochi, Russia (a traditional time of peace) saw an illegal and
violent overthrow of the elected constitutional government in Ukraine, followed
by the establishment of a puppet administration chosen by the United States,
the majority Russian population of the Autonomous region of Crimea held a
referendum. Approximately 95% of them chose to separate from Ukraine and become
part of Russia that had already been for centuries and until very recently. The
Russians then used the troops already stationed in the region under an
international agreement to ensure that the results of the referendum were duly
enacted. Not a single shot was fired during this perfectly peaceful exercise in
direct democracy.
3.- Again the example of Crimea; During
the summer olympic games in Rio de Janeiro (a traditional time of peace),
several Ukrainian operatives stormed the borders of Crimea, they were quickly
learned by the Russian Federal Security Service, along with a cache of weapons
and explosives, several of them died during the process along with two Russian
soldiers; The survivors immediately confessed that they planned to organize
terrorist attacks on the ferry that links Crimea with the Russian mainland and
a railway station, the leader of the group confessed to having received the
promised sum of thousands of dollars to carry out these attacks, eager for a
hot, dry bunk and three meals a day, cared for by the Russian government that
must seem like a piece of heaven compared to the violence,the chaos and
desolation that characterizes life in today's Ukraine. In response, the Kiev
government protested against the Russian "provocation" and put and
put its troops on alert to prepare against the "Russian invasion."
Perhaps the next US aid shipment to Ukraine should
include a supply of antipsychotics. Keep in mind the constant refrain of this
music, it always occurs during the "Olympics". This is no
coincidence, but it is indicative of a certain American modus operandi,
"If you make war during a traditional time of peace" it is both
cynical, it is stupid, but the American motto seems to be "If we try
something repeatedly, and it still doesn't work, so we're not trying hard
enough. " In the minds of those who plan these events, the reason why they
never work well may have something to do with it being
stupid. This is known as "level 3 stupid" -
stupidity so deep that you are unable to know your own stupidity.
4.- The example of Dombass, after the
events described in point 2 above, this populous and industrialized region that
was part of Russia until the early 20th century, and linguistically and
culturally Russian. I fell into chaos because most of the locals wanted nothing
to do with the government that had been forcibly installed in Kiev, which they
considered illegitimate. The Kiev government proceeded to make matters worse,
first by enacting laws that violated the rights of Russian-speaking people and
then by attacking the region with the army, which they continue to do to this day
with three failed invasions and continuous bombardment, against residential and
industrial areas, in the course of which more than ten thousand civilians have
been killed and many more injured, Russia in response,I help establish a local
resistance movement supported by a capable military contingent made up of local
residents.
This was done by Russian volunteers, acting
unofficially, and by private Russian citizens who donate money to the cause.
Despite the Western hysteria about the "Russian invasion" and
"Russian aggression," there is no evidence that it exists. Instead,
the Russian government has only done three things - it refused to interfere
with the work of its citizens by coming to the aid of Dombass, pursued a
diplomatic strategy to resolve the conflict, and has provided numerous convoys
of humanitarian aid to the residents of Dombass.
The diplomatic initiative of Russia gave
rise to two international agreements Minsk 1, and Minsk 2, which forced both
Kiev and Dombass to follow a strategy of political resolution to the conflict
through the cessation of hostilities and granting Dombass full autonomy. Kiev
has steadfastly refused to fulfill its obligations under these agreements. The
conflict is now frozen, but continues to bleed due to the Ukrainian
bombardment, waiting for the Ukrainian puppet government to collapse, to complete
the picture, let's include the recent military action in Syria, where it came
out in defense of the beleaguered Syrian government and demolished a much of
the Islamic state and the Islamic caliphate along with various other terrorist
organizations active in the region.The reason for these actions is that Russia
saw a nest of foreign-funded terrorists in Syria as a direct threat to Russia's
security.
Turning now to the military and diplomatic
adventures of the United States, we see a situation that is quite different.
United States military spending is responsible for more than half of all
federal discretionary spending, overshadowing other vital sectors such as
infrastructure, medicine, and public education, serving several purposes. Most
importantly, it is a public employment program: a way to employ people who
cannot find employment in any truly productive capacity due to lack of
intelligence, education, and training. Second, it is a way for politicians and
defense contractors to enrich each other synergistically and at the expense of
the public. Third, it is an advertising program for the sale of weapons,being
the United States the main supplier of lethal weapons in the world.
Finally, it is a way of projecting force
around the world, bombarding any country that dares to oppose Washington's
hegemonic ambitions, often with total disregard for international law, nowhere
on this list is the objective of defending the United States none of these
justifications works with respect to Russia.
In dollar terms, the United States surpasses Russia
in defense. However, viewed in terms of purchasing parity, Russia manages
to buy up to ten times more defensive capacity per unit of national wealth than
the United States. 31.07 mill.
Article by Dimitri Orlov.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario